Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 10

August 10

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joseph S DiDonato (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

all red links. Frietjes (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 August 18 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Khatri Surnames (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a completely unverifiable list of names. It is common for members of Indian castes to claim that certain names are "owned" by the caste but it is never verifiable. Indeed, that is one reason why we do not allow people to claim that bearing a certain name allows us to state that they belong to a certain caste. Sitush (talk) 06:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some background at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. - Sitush (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
An IP just removed this log entry and also the TfD template. I have reinstated. - Sitush (talk) 09:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.