Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 April 2

< April 1	April 3 >

April 2 edit

Template:Infobox former monarchy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox former monarchy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox monarchy}}, two which the |last_monarch=} and |ended= parameters, and any necessary logic relating to |incumbent=, should be added. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
merge, although shouldn't {{Infobox monarchy}} be tagged if we are proposing changing that template? Frietjes (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox former NASCAR team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox former NASCAR team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox NASCAR team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox former NASCAR team with Template:Infobox NASCAR team.
We shouldn't have separate templates for live and former teams; nor need to change template if a team folds. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Per nom. Two templates are a bad idea because it wastes time when a team folds. Royal broil 03:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom —PC-XT+ 06:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
merge, and I have now merged the syntax, so the former can be redirected to the current and everything will still work. Frietjes (talk) 22:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - Chaos will unfold once teams start folding. Zappa O Mati 03:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - No reason for two boxes here when one will work just fine. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox US Navy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox US Navy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox official post}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete after replacement. I just rewrote it as a trivial wrapper, so it is clearly redundant. Frietjes (talk) 22:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Official post can do the job just fine. Illegitimate Barrister 05:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox former political post edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox former political post (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox official post}} (to which {{Infobox political post}} redirects). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I believe the nom meant to say {{Infobox political post}} redirects to {{Infobox official post}} —PC-XT+ 02:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Thank you. Fixed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom —PC-XT+ 06:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom.—indopug (talk) 05:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Most populous US cities by state edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Most populous US cities by state (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Most populous US cities by state into List of United States cities by population or listify as a separate, standalone list. This information isn't quite suited to a navigation template, as the articles included aren't sufficiently interrelated. Of the five primary navbox guidelines, this one only fits #2 well and #1 marginally. Ibadibam (talk) 06:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge then delete • Sbmeirow • Talk • 05:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:HIP 13044 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HIP 13044 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Planet has been shown not to exist. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or expand — A nonexistent planet may have a navbox to help document the time when it was thought to exist and how it was found to not exist. Like it is, though, this navbox barely navigates anything. —PC-XT+ 02:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC) (I am inclined to say delete with the possibility of recreation at a later time, if needed.) —PC-XT+ 02:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unnecessary at present, as one of the two articles represented in the navbox is now a redirect pointing to the other one. 77.56.99.23 (talk) 09:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.