Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 25

< July 24	July 26 >

July 25 edit

Template:Consider disambiguation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Consider disambiguation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Really ugly and confusing wording. Duplicates with Template:About, but has different syntax. ï¿½ (talk) 13:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only use generates more questions than answers: why a reader currently in an article with a parenthetical disambiguation should consider reading about one of homonymous churches on the opposite side of the planet? Delete unless the author explains where this stuff can look more convincing. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia talk:Hatnote/Archive 3#Trivial hatnote links for the genesis of this template. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I roughly understand what they spoke about, but how is it related to [1]? Can JHunterJ, BigNate37, or someone else explain why one should preferentially go to Malaysia from Manhattan, not to a homonymous church in Chile? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The use in Church of Our Lady of Sorrows (New York City) is confusing. At one point in time, there was a separate disambiguation page for Church of Our Lady of Sorrows. That page, including the edit history, was later merged into the disambiguation page at Our Lady of Sorrows Church. I think this gives an idea of what the dab page looked like when BigNate37 added the template. older ≠ wiser 17:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, better to just use {{about}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An experiment that has petered out. older ≠ wiser 17:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:22, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Empire Mates Entertainment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Empire Mates Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Record label without an article and only three links for artists who don't have any other notable connection. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 07:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, never thought record-label-centric navboxes were a good idea, just bloat to the foot of the article, and redundant to categories. Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as there is no need to navigate between articles only related in this way. Using a Category is how these should be grouped. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Banky W edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 2 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Banky W (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Links to 4 relevant articles, including the banner article. Dea db eef 07:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hong Kong squad AFC Asian Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hong Kong squad 1956 AFC Asian Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hong Kong squad 1964 AFC Asian Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hong Kong squad 1968 AFC Asian Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

They don't have any blue links. So they shouldn't exist. Banhtrung1 (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete navigates nothing. Wouldn't be of value if it did. Reso lute 13:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.