Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 January 31

< January 30	February 1 >

January 31 edit

Template:Black Eyes track listing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Black Eyes track listing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only links one article. Frietjes (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unnecessary. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Aloha Milkyway tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aloha Milkyway tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only links two articles and redundant to navigation in {{Eraserheads}}. Frietjes (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There's probably a couple dozen similar ones in Category:Album track list templates. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Is This It edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Is This It (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:The Strokes —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, ahhh my eyes, the goggles do nothing ... and redundant per nom. Frietjes (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom. Redundant. The artist navbox serves this purpose of navigation just fine. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Compactlink Timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Compactlink Timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary decorative icon. Frietjes (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History of the Republic of Turkey edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of the Republic of Turkey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

navigates nothing. Frietjes (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BwDCouncil edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BwDCouncil (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and out of date. Frietjes (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:On the Third Day tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:On the Third Day tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used in one article. Frietjes (talk) 20:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The full track list is one click away and having it in this article, without any other useful links, adds nothing. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Summer in Paradise tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Summer in Paradise tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, and the connection is a bit tenuous, since most of these songs weren't Beach Boys originals. Frietjes (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SrcLink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SrcLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

this template was being used in about eight or so wikiproject pages to display [[Article]], which was generating unnecessary links to the article named article. I have since replaced it with {{brackets}}, which does the same thing. Frietjes (talk) 19:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Double image stack edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Double image stack (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused wrapper for {{multiple image}}. Frietjes (talk) 18:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

flag templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abbasid Caliphate Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ilkhanate Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Islamic republic of Iran Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Mongol Empire Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pahlavi Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Qajar Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Rashidun Caliphs Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Sassanid Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Safavid Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Seljuqid Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Timurid Flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Umayyad Caliphate flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

these were only being used in one article, Nishapur, for decoration. they are redundant to the current {{flagicon}} and {{flagicon image}} system. Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment are these flags accessible from the flag system? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- yes, most are, for example {{Abbasid Caliphate Flag}} is actually {{flagicon|Libya|1977}}, and {{Islamic republic of Iran Flag}} is actually {{flagicon|Iran}}. Frietjes (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oil on canvas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oil on canvas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, could potentially be deleted as {{db-test}}, but the edit summary indicates that it may not be a test. Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a proper template, it's boilerplate text, and just says "oil on canvas", which is shorter to type than to use the template -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think we need to discuss these Commons-derived templates in general. I know I have been pretty inconsistent about them. The fact is, images from Commons are temporarily uploaded here when in use on the main page. This means that ugly template redlinks will show up in the file description pages when Commons templates that do not exist locally are used. The question is, do we expect the admin who uploads the image here to remove/change references to templates that we lack locally (seems unreasonable - they are overworked enough as is - and what if the template is a license tag we don't have here?), or do we maintain identical templates here with the same names as they have on Commons? — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- these uploads are usually for a short period of time. a better solution would be for the upload process to include substitution of these templates before upload, since most of them are there for inter-language support, but we only need the English version on this WP. in this particular case, seeing {{oil on canvas}} is no less informative than seeing "oil on canvas", so no information is lost by deleting it. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Commons has many templates that are completely useless on en.wiki, and several other templates that are incompatible with their equivalents on en.wiki, or which are completely different templates on en.wiki; any transferred images should strip their templates except for the license and info basic templates. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Museums of Paleorrota edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Museums of Paleorrota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and blanked. Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Central Philippine University presidents edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Central Philippine University presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Links only one entry. Does not aid someone in navigating multiple WP articles at all. Xeltran (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, but make sure the list is in the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Simpsons Christmas episodes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Simpsons Christmas episodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

For the same reason it was deleted 5 years ago along with the category. Some of the episodes are only partially Christmas related such as Kill Gil, Volumes I & II, which only starts at Christmas, Skinner's Sense of Snow is on the day before Christmas break, so isn't even directly Christmas themed, and She of Little Faith is mostly about Lisa being a Buddist and only incidently has Christmas briefly in it. CTF83! 04:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No set definition of what makes them Christmas episodes, unlike the Treehouse of Horror episodes. Dough 48 72 17:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 19:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:La Academia winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:La Academia winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:La Academia Second Place Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:La Academia Second Place Winners (Runner-Up) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

While surely the second place templates are just redundant, I've nominated all 3 of these for deletion because navigation to the articles and the topics are all covered in the main navigation box, {{La Academia}} Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 19:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Classical physics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Classical physics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete: It isn't much use as a template; it does point to physics topics where classical mechanics applies, but this should already be clear in well-written articles. It mainly links to scientists. Currently it is no longer used (in mainspace) [1] - hence redundant. There are template:classical mechanics, template:continuum mechanics, template:statistical mechanics, template:thermodynamics, and template:electromagnetism, which are more focussed and better suited to point to the main areas of classical physics, within an article. Please see a recent discussion here. M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 13:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Useful categorization for all topics of (classical) physics. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Which is what categories are better for, there isn't one for Category:Classical physics. M∧Ŝc²ħε И_τlk 08:02, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are few, if any, candidates for transcluding this. If we need a navbox for those, I would suggest to make one with a broader scope, covering all of physics. — HHHIPPO 17:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.