Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 April 29

< April 28	April 30 >

April 29 edit

Template:James Arnold Taylor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:James Arnold Taylor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

the convention is to navigate by director, not by actor (or voice actor). if we had one of these for every actor, the bottom of the film articles would be filled with them. Frietjes (talk) 20:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Navboxes-by-actor is a recipe for clutter. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Lancaster College edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Lancaster College (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Otago college (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by {{infobox residential college}}. Frietjes (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fede Alvarez edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fede Alvarez (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Lack of content. The template only links to the director's article and the Evil Dead one. "Ataque de Pánico!" is a redirect to a section in the director's article. uKER (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete. if more movies are directed, then this can be recreated, but until then ... Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Osmrelation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Osmrelation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:OSM relation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Osmrelation with Template:OSM relation.
Same purpose; the former has better output text, and is more widely used; the latter has the better name. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:33, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge, or move Template:OSM relation to Template:OSM relation link, and have Template:Osmrelation call it to generate the link. Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
merge the former into the latter. Template:OSM relation has a better name. - tucoxn\^talk 01:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: similar names. Plus, they will serve the same purpose. Epicgenius^{(talk to me • see my contributions)} 00:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Lantlôs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lantlôs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Most of the articles in the NavBox have been deleted (via uncontested PRODs). :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 04:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, now pointless. Frietjes (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.