Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 April 12

< April 11	April 13 >

April 12 edit

Template:Rochester Rhinos edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rochester Rhinos (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless navigation template. There are only two articles and two Categories (one of which is a redlink) listed in this template; that's not nearly enough to justify a navbox. Powers ^T 23:16, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jackson Generals roster navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jackson Generals roster navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Similar to the Richmond navbox, there are too many non-notable people listed in this template. The redlinks are too much per WP:NAVBOX#Navigation templates provide navigation between existing articles. It doesn't help that so many of the blue links aren't to their own pages, but to sections on Seattle Mariners minor league players. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with Muboshgu.--Yankees10 16:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Richmond Flying Squirrels roster navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:37, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Richmond Flying Squirrels roster navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few players for a Class AA minor league team are notable for a navbox to be worthwhile. Per WP:NAVBOX#Navigation templates provide navigation between existing articles, a navbox should not include so much unlinked text, and turning these into redlinks wouldn't help. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Wikiholicdude (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with Muboshgu.--Yankees10 16:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Geocompass2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geocompass2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{geographic location}}. Frietjes (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Contemplation (Kafka) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Contemplation (Kafka) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No linked articles. Nothing to navigate between, so no use for this navbox. INeverCry 18:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree, it's quite pointless. If and when each story gets its own article, then a navbox would be a good idea.---- Atlantima ~🌼~ (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Atlantima ~🌼~ (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Xi Xi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Xi Xi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There are no articles on this writer's works, making this navbox unneeded. INeverCry 17:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Same as above. If and when each story gets its own article, then a navbox would be a good idea.---- Atlantima ~🌼~ (talk) 18:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Atlantima ~🌼~ (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.