Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 31

< March 30	April 1 >

March 31 edit

Template:Mercy Fall edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mercy Fall (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates very few article - just the band's main page and album page (the single redirects to the album page). WP:NENAN. Gongshow ^Talk 22:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The articles are all (both) well inter-linked--this isn't really navigating anything. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:26, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Koavf e^xtra999 (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, textbook WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox chinese/China/Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox chinese/China/Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst and Delete: Why does this exist? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a boilerplate for four articles? Two Chinas, One-China policy, Chinese reunification, Cross-Strait relations ; repetition or a template... 70.24.244.198 (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You just added atleast three of those. --Cold Season (talk) 05:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response It was only on Two Chinas when I tagged it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is however textually the same to what was there before. 70.24.244.198 (talk) 03:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the "Subst and Delete", not a template that can be used as most-often the description can't be "standardized" in these heavily-debated topics, no added benefit over the regular wiki markup either. --Cold Season (talk) 05:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per above. Liam987 11:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.