Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 19

March 19

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team Winner play-off (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Simple text; unused. Jared Preston (talk) 21:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Easy as that. -Koppapa (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team Gloucester (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Delete. Easy as that. -Koppapa (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Jared Preston (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team London Wasps (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Jared Preston (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Easy as that. -Koppapa (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox TransLink (SEQ) operator (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to other, more generic, transport operator infoboxes. Only two transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox U-19 cricket team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox cricket team}}; only 35 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team 1. FC Heidenheim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Jared Preston (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team 1. FC Saarbrücken (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Co-nominated for the same reason. Jared Preston (talk) 21:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. Easy as that. -Koppapa (talk) 06:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox University Student Union & Activity Center (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox students union}}; only 28 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP - I just want to make the argument if you look at the two templates they cover two different things. A "student union" is a student organization which is what the original template covers, which is basically how a student union is in the United Kingdom. That is what the template covers, that is why they list various officers. The one I made covers student unions and student centers not the student organizations but the physical buildings that every university and college has in the united states. Universities in the united state don't have the student organization "student union" any more. As well this template proposed for deletion is used on at least 15-20 pages.Pwojdacz (talk) 20:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The way this is actually deployed it's redundant to {{infobox building}}. While occasionally we have specific infoboxes for certain types of building (such as schools), that's because there's an established consensus that there is a need for the infoboxes on said subjects to contain topic-specific information (and a school is not just a building: "school" refers just as much to the faculty as the bricks and mortar, and the infobox covers both). There are no such fields here, as the specific functionality of a given union building is really WP:GUIDE trivia rather than a notable aspect of the subject. On another note, looking through the transclusions it's difficult to argue that we need separate articles for the union-as-organisation and union-as-building in most cases anyway. I'd hope that having an unnecessary building-specific infobox wasn't exacerbating that. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete - Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) I think your explanation is fair and makes sense. I think with a reasonable explanation you cant argue with it. I guess it was hard to understand when the nomination spured from someone who nominated it without even knowing what the template was. I agree with your point and I went through and switched all the pages using this template over to {{infobox building}}. We can delete the template because it's not longer in use Pwojdacz (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sahabi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use, undocumented, purpose and potential scope unclear. subst, or replace with something more generic? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Macedonians Image Array (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1. severe issues as per Template talk:Macedonians_Image_Array 2. currently unused Widefox (talk) 12:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Otherlang2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate way of highlighting interwiki language links. Appears to have been imported from somewhere else. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Homer infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-transclusion infobox. Can be trivially substituted onto the one article that uses it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.