Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 30

< June 29	July 1 >

June 30 edit

Template:JJ Project edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JJ Project (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, WP:TOOSOON. Links to one song and a soundtrack on which they are only one of many contributors Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it there are five articles here. One ("Dream High") should not be in the navbox, but Bounce (JJ Project song) should be in (for as long as it is not merged!). I can't bring myself to say either "keep" or "delete". — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there already is another album in the works, and they are going on tour. If the template is deleted, it will just have to be re-created. Why bother? Mikepellerin (talk) 21:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Capitals of Members of the Commonwealth of Nations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:33, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Capitals of Members of the Commonwealth of Nations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template really doesn't have any decent uses. There's already a country membership template, and a giant list of cities doesn't help the reader at all. The cities aren't related, and are only relevant due to their countries (who as mentioned already have a template). CMD (talk) 23:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Barcelona Metro/next edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:33, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Barcelona Metro/next (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Barcelona Metro/background color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Barcelona Metro/eastern terminus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Barcelona Metro/next special (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Barcelona Metro/text color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Barcelona Metro/western terminus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Custom succession box system replaced by the standard {{S-line}}. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Monasterycats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Monasterycats (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gold Coast United FC squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gold Coast United FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

club folded. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Making Fiends edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Making Fiends (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not really needed per WP:NENAN: only navigates three articles. Judging from Category:Making Fiends, there are another two articles that could be added, but even five articles seems barely enough to justify a navbox. Robofish (talk) 12:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Egypt Cup 2007-08 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Egypt Cup 2007-08 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed for individual cup seasons. Unused anyway Koppapa (talk) 08:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, and seems like a bad idea. Robofish (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, complete overkill. Giant Snowman 11:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Polytonic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, nothing has changed in the past few weeks. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:35, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Polytonic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, few uses. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. See the previous discussion of June 13 in which I, as nominator (User:Cardiffchestnut before a rename), reconsidered after another editor pointed out that the Greek nested in this template would be illegible in older article revisions. ^davidiad _.: 05:47, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, again keep please, for the same reasons as at the last nomination. This used to be a very densely used inline template on some articles, and deleting it would make entire articles unreadable in their older revisions. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
so we are just going to keep renominating templates every two weeks? try again in about a year, but renominating this quickly is ridiculous. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as above. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 12:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.