Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 22 June 24 >

June 23 edit

Template:Translation request edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Translation request (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Now unused and deprecated with the collection at Category:Expand by language Wikipedia templates. The redirects to this template can also be deleted. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uw-ilc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-ilc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused (but typically subst). Images with this concern should be FFD's which already notifies. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep If the conflicting licensing can be resolved without sending the image to FFD, than it's a good thing. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 12:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Oklahoma education navigational boxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete any with very few links. In this case, I will use a cutoff of 2 or fewer active links. If there are any left over, please feel free to relist those. If there are any which are deleted, and deletion is determined to be controversial, I will happily restore them. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oklahoma education navigational boxes

I've expanded this to the content of the category. The vast majority of the templates do not have enough articles to be navigational templates of substantial uses. I can see it making sense to have one template which perhaps lists the schools and the districts in two lists, but one template for every district is nonsensical given that the majority of these templates are unlikely to be filled out in the near future. Will fill in the rest of the links above when I pull the list from AWB. All templates have been tagged. --Izno (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Usercompare edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:02, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Usercompare (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

generates broken links, could be substituted and deleted, but it does not appear that the tool exists anymore. Frietjes (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UserProxy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UserProxy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and purpose unclear. Frietjes (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Walcott1908 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Walcott1908 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Walcott1911 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Walcott1912 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used on one page, could be simply substituted and deleted. Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Website archives edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Website archives (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and redundant to {{official website|...|Website archives}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Japanese Bibliography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Japanese Bibliography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused frontend to a more fully featured template. Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unable to set class or importance parameters. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Puntland Transitional Pilot Project edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Puntland Transitional Pilot Project (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and appears to be a broken fork of another template. Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Display none edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Display none (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

the only reason to enclose text with "display none" is for sortkeys in tables, but for that we already have {{sort}}, so this is redundant. Frietjes (talk) 16:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Brunei Barracudas current roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:56, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brunei Barracudas current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN with 3 links. No prejudice to recreation when the template can be filled out. Izno (talk) 15:34, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asia All Stars 1967-1968 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:56, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asia All Stars 1967-1968 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is full of redlinks, and does not link to anything in article space which might establish the existence of the group concerned SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom *Annas* (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bangkok rail transit map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bangkok rail transit map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I created this partly as an experiment with route diagram templates, but this (a map showing multiple systems) isn't really what the template scheme was designed for. It's somewhat difficult to understand, and as the systems are expanded the template will become more and more unwieldy. An image map would better serve the template's purpose; Most of the station links have been redirected anyway. Paul_012 (talk) 07:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_June_23&oldid=1138696258"