Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 11

< June 10	June 12 >

June 11 edit

Template:Weight Pentathlon top edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weight Pentathlon top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused outside of one user's talk page. Frietjes (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Awake (TV series) cast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Awake (TV series) cast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template just lists cast members for a TV show, and it is added to each actors page. If we did this for every TV show, actor pages would be flooded with templates. While merging to Template:Awake (TV series) would be an alternative to deletion, a quick check of a handful of popular TV show templates shows that listing cast members on such a template is not the usual practice.Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Templates are the new categories -they're getting created en masse with little thought to propriety. As the nominator points out, it would be insanely counterproductive to allow templates for each show or film an actor had been in. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 21:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As creator. Also nominate Template:Family Guy cast. TBrandley • talk • contributions 22:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is actually consensus not to include actors' in such navboxes. One of the reasons for this was that some actors could end up with hundreds of navboxes on their pages. Please don't ask me where that consensus was formed, it was a long time ago. --AussieLegend (talk) 06:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fluminense edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fluminense (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fluminense Football Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Grêmio de Foot-Ball Porto-Alegrense (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Guarani Futebol Clube (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:12, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom. I can't see any of these serving any purpose. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DirectingFilmography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DirectingFilmography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Filmography-movie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used in two articles, replaced by a standard wikitable. Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Etext3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Etext3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

surely there must be a better way of doing this? see template:Etext. Frietjes (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The way it is used now, it should be a triple column table. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EqNum edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EqNum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused outside of userspace, where as {{NumBlk}} is used. Frietjes (talk) 17:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox frame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox frame (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:End frame (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

deprecated for over four years now, we should just kill it. Frietjes (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DemocraticHK edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DemocraticHK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Default arguments edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Default arguments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second. Unused and not very useful, imho. Debresser (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:D&D deity table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D&D deity table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ColumHeader edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ColumHeader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Where is it edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Where is it (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{context}}. Geographic location is only one of many different pieces of context that are required for articles. Less than two dozen transclusions. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak agree In general I see no problem with having more specific templates to specify the more general ones. In the case of lead templates I agree with the nominator that this is not needed so much, although I think this template is not used much . Also, I find the name of this template a little simple, awkward. Debresser (talk) 23:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pink Friday edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pink Friday (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pink Friday trilogy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per precedent of previously deleted templates and, for the most part, redundant to {{Nicki Minaj}} and {{Nicki Minaj singles}}; not to mention the template for a "trilogy" in which the third part doesn't exist yet. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 09:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:H&M edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:H&M (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate use of navbox. This is essentially performer-by-performance since it navigates people who were in H&M ad campaigns. Several of the pages, including Daria Werbowy, make no mention of H&M whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These pages are not realistically expected to link to each other, so a navbox isn't appropriate. What's more, this appears to be very region-specific at the moment and would probably become impossible to maintain if expanded to have global coverage. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Suzhou Rail Transit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep —Hahc 21 17:40, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suzhou Rail Transit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Unneeded category. All it contains is two categories. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, such templates are often used for station navboxes. I have rewrote it. --Makecat _Talk 02:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a standard navbox under development. (I don't understand what categories have got to do with it?) Sw2nd (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

keep, seems like a misunderstanding. I added some documentation and cleaned up the presentation to make it more clear how the template is used. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.