Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 31

< July 30	August 1 >

July 31 edit

Template:DF temperature edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DF temperature (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 1 transclusion on an image that currently isn't used in mainspace AND is a candidate for transfer to Commons. A Commons version of this template already exists. Axem Titanium (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with the concerns by Axem Titanium, we do not necessarily need to create a duplicated template when one exits in the Commons. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WTA Challenger seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 12:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTA Challenger seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template has only two links, not enough for a navbox per WP:NENAN. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 12:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 17:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WTA Challenger tournaments edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTA Challenger tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template has only three blue links, not enough for a navbox per WP:NENAN. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 12:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because the WTA plans on increasing the number of events in the near future. i.e. this year. Popsiclesare (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NeverLeavesBurrillville edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NeverLeavesBurrillville (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template creates a hatnote advising the reader that the tagged highway never leaves Burrillville, Rhode Island. There are apparently only two such state highways, so this template would never be used on more than two pages. In any event, this would be just as easily stated in prose or handled by {{jcttop}}. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 10:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, of very little use and its redundant to prose or another template. Imzadi 1979 → 11:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because this template is very depressing. V C 12:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Useless. Dough 48 72 15:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Why would a template be useful for only two possible uses? This is slightly redundant to functionality of {{jcttop}} and is better just stated in prose. -- LJ ↗ 16:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per VC. –Fredddie ™ 23:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedia:WikiProject University of North Texas/Member userbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject University of North Texas/Member userbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recommend deletion of this template. It is not being used and hasn't for quite a long time. Kumioko (talk) 02:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject University of North Texas/Member userbox Ego White Tray (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UKsta-u B edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UKsta-u B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, probably meant to be part of {{UKsta-u}}/{{UKsta-u A}}, but most likely should just create a row in that case. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as creator, yes it was meant to be used in conjuction with the other two, to show usages for separate branches. I had experiemented with it previouly but failed in combining it which this allows me to do so. Simply south...... always punctual, no matter how late for just 6 years 17:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- please help with documentation and usage, since you "failed in combining it", we should either fix it or delete it. am I correct that you were planning to use it in the middle of a table? if so, then would this version be more appropriate? Frietjes (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I was but only on articles that needed it e.g. Riviera Line. Not all railway lines have branches. These templates serve as a replacement for older templates (although |}|} must still be added at the end of each template). I guess I need to learn Doc. Simply south...... always punctual, no matter how late for just 6 years 19:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.