Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 23

July 23 edit

Template:SLBYs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per CSD T3. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SLBYs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:SLBYf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

merged with {{SLBY}}. Frietjes (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nolink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nolink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no need for a template to create easter eggs, we can do that using a simple pipe. Frietjes (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like Wikidemon ever developed this further. As it's used solely on a closing statement in one of his talk archives, we don't really need it (or Wikipedia:NULLINK, created at the same time). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Unlimited access edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unlimited access (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused boilerplate. Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South American Games infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per CSD T3. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South American Games infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:South American Games infobox/Host city (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:South American Games infobox/Closing ceremony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:South American Games infobox/Opening ceremony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:South American Games infobox/Events (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:South American Games infobox/Stadium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

most all the games infoboxes were merged into template:infobox games. we don't need this one anymore. Frietjes (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:June Allyson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:June Allyson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is for an actor's filmography. Previous consensus has been for actors NOT to have navigation templates for this, due to template clutter. Lugnuts (talk) 08:12, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2012OlympicGymnasticsSchedule edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2012OlympicGymnasticsSchedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Originally used in one article only, I have subst'ed it. There is no point in hiding content behind templates (despite no harm meant, for sure) Nabla (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Shouldn't this TFD be bundled with the rest of the templates in Category:2012 Summer Olympics schedule templates? They all seem to deal with the same problem.--SGCM (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes all these are similar and probably should have the same fate, but I am not in the mood to take the trouble to read/edit/nominate a whole bunch of templates, as I've been editing only "by chance" (i.e., if I use WP and see something worth editing I do, I am not 'working' here currently) - Nabla (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.