Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 29

< January 28	January 30 >

January 29 edit

Template:Pinksheets edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pinksheets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now that we have templates {{OTCQX}}, {{OTCQB}}, and {{OTCPink}}, which specify their tiers, {{Pinksheets}} can be deprecated in favor of one of the more specific templates. ANDROS¹³³⁷ _TALK 21:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox architectural historian edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox architectural historian (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Copy from Infobox scientist. It could speedy deleted under T3 CSD. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Magioladitis (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Houston Texans team-specific awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Houston Texans Team MVP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Houston Texans Rookie of the Year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team-specific awards do not deserve navboxes. At most, mention this in prose on the player's article, do not add more navbox clutter (which causes WP:LINKCRISIS). Sports need to be very careful about truly warrants navboxes, and these IMO certainly do not. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, WP:NENAN. Reso lute 17:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UTSA Roadrunners football navbox/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UTSA Roadrunners football navbox/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template documentation is unused and now unnecessary. It documents a college football team navbox that originally had many sections to it, but once WP:CFB gained consensus on how these types of team navboxes should be laid out, it rendered this documentation unusable. This is a general housekeeping request for deletion more than anything. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. cmadler (talk) 15:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.