Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 12

< February 11	February 13 >

February 12

Template:Yr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, meant to be subst? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ytterbium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ytterbium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Tag , unused element template Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment in the last TfD, it was kept because it's part of a series 70.24.247.54 (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, series element. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zara (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since August 2010 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 18:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zares/meta/shortname

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zares/meta/shortname (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template , was this deprecated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zentrum/meta/shortname

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zentrum/meta/shortname (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, was this deprecated? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Template:Centre Party (Germany)/meta/shortname is used instead. --[[User:One-eyed pirate|one-eyed pirate]] (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rugby League Club Competitions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugby League Club Competitions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Apparently blanked as inaccurate back in 2009 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest preview software release/Redmine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview software release/Redmine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Outdated , blanked? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kings of the Britons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kings of the Britons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seemingly deprecated and blanked

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History of apportionment in the European Parliament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of apportionment in the European Parliament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused , content merged to article . Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EP apportionment influence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EP apportionment influence (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, blank... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Leeds City Vixens L.F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Leeds City Vixens L.F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, only seemingly relevant to a single article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProjectBannerShell/Compliant banner list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProjectBannerShell/Compliant banner list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Apparently redundant - see history... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not required any more. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 23:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Table of referendums relating to the Constitution of Ireland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to a subpage and redirect to preserve attribution. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Table of referendums relating to the Constitution of Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blank template - Contents apparently merged into another. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I previously merged this template into the only article on Wikipedia which actually used it. However given that the template has a reasonably long history, deleting it may incur copyright issues. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. — Blue-Haired Lawyer ^t 11:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Proposed districts of Northern Ireland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Proposed districts of Northern Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Proposed reform of local government was abandonded in 2010 (see link here) and all articles in the template were subsequently merged into a single article Proposed reform of local government in Northern Ireland thus rendering the template superfluous. Valenciano (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Navigation templates exist to navigate between articles, and it are pointless if there is only one article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ocean Village ships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:09, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ocean Village ships (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Ocean Village is no longer in business. All of their ships were sold and are now renamed and have articles under the new names. Template is redundant to the newly named ships not to mention its eye-bleeding colors. Brad (talk) 09:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator as redundant. And yes, it does hurt. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, just because the company is no longer in business does not mean that there is no need for the template - q.v. {{White Star Line ships}} Agree that colours could be better, but that is something easy enough to fix. Mjroots (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WSL template is useful in that all of the ships operated by the WSL are now out of service; there were a lot of them to boot. This is not the case with the OV ships. There were only two OV ships and they're now in service elsewhere and now listed on other templates. Brad (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN (there's three links in this template, plus of all things an image; if we keep the template, can we please take that out?). We don't need to argue about the redundancy if the template is superfluous anyway. --N Y Kevin @940, i.e. 21:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.