Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 10

< February 9	February 11 >

February 10 edit

Template:AFD-note edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFD-note (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Undefined purpose. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Probably unused due to WP:SUBST. OTOH, documentation would be nice... Without actually looking, I'd guess that one of the AfD templates half-uses this, leaving it apparently unused. --N Y Kevin @917, i.e. 21:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: text extremely similar to this template's contents appears in {{afd top}}, making this template redundant. I doubt it's used anywhere else. --N Y Kevin @937, i.e. 21:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SnaKeBit3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by SatyrTN (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) 03:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SnaKeBit3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See this discussion for reasons why this template should be deleted. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Deivathirumagal Official website edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deivathirumagal Official website (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, pointless template. Johannes003 (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as it is unused. Jorgath (talk) 22:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nfccremoved edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted WP:CSD#G7 at author's request. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nfccremoved (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:GLNF and unclear how to use. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, okay to speedy (as creator). This was a work in progress that I never completed. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.