Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 December 21

< December 20	December 22 >

December 21

Template:Envy & Other Sins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Envy & Other Sins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one album and one song. The list of songs should probably be merged or deleted. No individual articles for band members. WP:NENAN. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:14, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - once you remove all the useless links, almost nothing is left, as mentioned above. I'm almost wondering if articles linked are deletion candidates, in fact. Ego White Tray (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cricket Aus state flag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cricket Aus state flag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Colours invented for Wikipedia. Precedence: Template:Cr-IPL/Flags. SocietyBox (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - These flags are an invention of some random Wikipedian and are therefore deletable as synthesis of new material. – Pee Jay 15:29, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary fluff. (A good, guideline and policy related rationale!) Harrias ^talk 16:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Adds nothing. No significance. Johnlp (talk) 23:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Zia Khan 13:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.