Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 9

< August 8	August 10 >

August 9 edit

Template:Nichole Nordeman edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn now that template is exapnded. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nichole Nordeman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, Links only 3 articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - reasonable enough for an aid to navigation. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NENAN is a highly contested essay. This is a useful navbox that meets all of the criteria established in the relevant guideline. Neelix (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I would argue that NENAN is generally accepted, though not universally. The opposition that does exist against it is not of the level to make it a "highly contested" essay. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Navbox has 5 articles, four of which now do not link to all of the albums. Woven & Spun makes 6.--Jax 0677 (talk) 03:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Campaignbox Afghan-Maratha Wars edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Duplicate. Magioladitis (talk) 09:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Afghan-Maratha Wars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused virtual copy of Template:Campaignbox Afghan-Maratha Conflicts. Super Mario Man 22:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as duplicate. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:28, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shimoga edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shimoga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incomplete navigational template with zero transclusions. If the creator intends to expand this, a move to userspace may be preferable to deletion. Super Mario Man 22:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Help! edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Better similar template exists. Magioladitis (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Help! (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is practically redundant with Template:help, if not technically (it seems to be intended for use in articlespace, which strikes me as a poor way to do things). This effectively qualifies it for WP:TFD#REASONS #2, particularly because the template it is redundant to uses a tracking category to ensure request visibility. BigNate37_(T) 22:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced its only transclusion with a more appropriate template. BigNate37_(T) 22:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete, then redirect to template:help me. Frietjes (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free media information and use rationale edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free media information and use rationale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The non-free use rationale and licence of a file description page that does not seem to exist - not an actual file description template. Unused and untranscluded. Super Mario Man 22:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not really useful since it has no input parameters Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Europe Innovation University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Europe Innovation University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-existent infobox. Super Mario Man 21:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Europe University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Europe University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-existent infobox. Super Mario Man 21:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:San Francisco Dogs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted. G3 as a blatant hoax. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Francisco Dogs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article in template namespace. Either about an obscure work of fiction or a hoax, as a Google search of "San Francisco Dogs" turns up nothing that is clearly connected to what is described here. Super Mario Man 21:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Indonesian martial arts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Navboxes should navigate between existing pages. Magioladitis (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indonesian martial arts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused at the time of nomination and consisting mostly of red links to non-existent articles, reducing template's usefulness as a navigational aid. Super Mario Man 21:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete as covered by Template:Martial arts by country of origin (which needs a massive clean up). Frietjes (talk) 15:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Café Bossa tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 09:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Café Bossa tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another one complete unused and unnecessary as all songs are covers and not notable by the artist, Sitti Navarro. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Christmas in Our Hearts tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Christmas in Our Hearts tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This one is unused and will never be used as all the songs on this album are Christmas song covered by numerous artists. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cutterpillow tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cutterpillow tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely unnecessary and excessive. used on only one article and fails to navigate to anywhere else. To view the full tracklist one can just link to Cutterpillow from the same article. [As an aside, what do people feel about these tracklist templates in general? There seem to have been a number of them created recently.]Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm ambivalent about the existence of tracklist templates, but if we are going to have them, I wonder if they shouldn't have their own category (e.g. Category:Music album tracklist templates perhaps?), as they are quite different to the other templates in Category:Music album templates. DH85868993 (talk) 04:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete as providing no real additional navigational value. we should have a category for them. Frietjes (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've created the category Category:Album track list templates for such templates. I didn't realize there were so many of them. I've nominated a few others as I've been going through them. Not sure of the need for those for a 12-track album with articles for only three of its songs, but that's for another discussion. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tl;dr edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tl;dr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Kind of silly and apparently not in use, discounting links from other templates Nobody Ent 13:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment but we have Wikipedia:Too long; didn't read , which isn't tagged with {{humor}} , so this does indicate a relevant essay on why a summary is provided -- 70.24.247.242 (talk) 04:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as template overkill. Just write: "In short:" or "In summary:". -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox etnic group edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox etnic group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template; no longer used since I substituted it. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious delete. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Grounded edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 10:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Grounded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unlikely scenario. Only a few people have ever used this. Rcsprinter (articulate) @ 09:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It can be used, and though it is kind of silly, like lots, it is there for as a useful template for editors. TBran dl ey 05:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – This template should be considered under a "looser" interpretation of normal criteria, just like the other message box templates in Category:Wikibreak templates. The template is not offensive or disruptive, and doesn't violate any Wikipedia policy. For these reasons, there is no compelling reason to delete. Senator2029 • talk 06:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.