Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 27

September 27 edit

Template:NoCommons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NoCommons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Keep local (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:NoCommons with Template:Keep local.
Redundant, easily confused with {{nowcommons}}, poorly named. Keep local has far more transclusions [1] [2] and is more explicit. --NYKevin @029, i.e. 23:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect NoCommons to KeepLocal. The redundancy is really redundant. I have added a tracking category to see if the "commons=" parameter is in use at all. I feel, though, that we can redirect regardless of this parameter's value, as it is not very important. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FYI-note edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FYI-note (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused except on two user talk pages. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 23:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Party Leader Infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Party Leader Infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should be replaced by {{Infobox Indian politician}} as it fails standard MOS and content requirements —SpacemanSpiff 21:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mein Augen. Yup, fairly obvious replacement candidate. I'd nuke the redirect as well, given the very low transclusion count and the unlikelihood of it being used to refer to the general infobox. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 12:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPUSEDU/Tabs/Tab edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, it appears the issues related to migrating these to {{start tab}} have been resolved. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPUSEDU/Tabs/Tab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:WPCAN/Tabs/Tab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:WPPUNE/Tabs/Tab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, following the transition of the templates which called them to use {{start tab}} directly. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep -- Please keep these; they are an important part of maintaining a specific look for the Wikipedia Global Education Program that is tied to the visual identity of the program. Additionally, the changes made are currently buggy, and we will need to revert back to what we had before in order to keep it working. -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • For the time being I've undone the changes which negatively impacted the cited project work, per my user talk. With any luck a more permanent solution will still be found before this TfD is up. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 23:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to partent template. -- WOSlinker (talk) 06:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
From To
Template:WPUSEDU/Tabs/Tab Template:Wikipedia United States Education Program/Tab
Template:WPUSEDU/Tabs/Spacer Template:Wikipedia United States Education Program/Spacer
Template:WPCAN/Tabs/Tab Template:Wikipedia Canada Education Program/Tab
Template:WPCAN/Tabs/Spacer Template:Wikipedia Canada Education Program/Spacer
Template:WPPUNE/Tabs/Tab Template:Wikipedia India Education Program/Tab
Template:WPPUNE/Tabs/Spacer Template:Wikipedia India Education Program/Spacer
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPAVIATION tabs/tab1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPAVIATION tabs/tab1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:WPAVIATION tabs/tab2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused following the transition of {{WPAVIATION tabs}} to use {{start tab}} instead of hand-cooked code. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject tabs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, after replacement Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:31, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject tabs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does the same thing as {{start tab}} but specific to WikiProjects. Was only used as Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation through Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/tabs, which has now been transitioned to use {{start tab}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does not seem to do the same thing as {{start tab}} as the result looks completely different! I have reverted your change to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/tabs. If you can achieve exactly the same functionality then I would not oppose a merge. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:06, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Unless I'm reading the {{tab}} code wrongly, it already supports adding garish colours and round borders should one choose to. That could be propagated to {{start tab}}, but it'd add another several kilobytes to the size of what is currently a simple and effective piece of code. On the other hand, {{WikiProject tabs}} defaults to these settings with no options to change them. (IMO this is a convincing reason for why it's never seen broader adoption.) I'd strongly argue in favour of simply using the plainer layout. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 14:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, but we will need to do some work on {{start tab}} to make it behave better when the contents is wider than the screen. Currently, the contents spills outside of the "div" frame. However, if we changed the template to use a table, rather than a div, this would be fixed (see the section of code around the "contents" for the nominated template). Frietjes (talk) 22:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPAVIATION task force tabs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPAVIATION task force tabs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded fork of {{WPAVIATION tabs}}, which is flexible enough to accommodate the required link changes. I've replaced the existing transclusions already. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TimmyCosmoWandaGames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TimmyCosmoWandaGames (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. All internal links are contained in {{The Fairly OddParents}}, which is in use. External links are not needed in a navbox. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Toddlers & Tiaras edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toddlers & Tiaras (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox which links to one article. Not useful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Total chalakim edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Total chalakim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Subtraction edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subtraction (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is redundant to {{#expr: - }}, which is shorter anyway. We don't need this kind of thing. Templates that do nothing but simple mathematical operations are unhelpful. JIMp talk·cont 01:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. We need to clear these things out. Lightmouse (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.