Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 October 10
| < October 9 | October 11 > |
|---|
October 10 edit
Template:Film record edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Film record (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
old and unused template, which has been replaced by simple wikitable markup. Frietjes (talk) 22:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Film series link edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
complicated template which attempts to determine the correct disambiguated link for a film article. old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Film version edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Film version (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Film version year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused templates which do not save that much in terms of typing. Frietjes (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:WRKelly edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Template:WRKelly (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
As with Template:WRJames and (I believe) Template:WRCharles recently, these are unnecessary templates for a few Waterloo Road characters when even the main Template:Waterloo Road template has been deleted. Articles are either redirects to List of Waterloo Road characters (the most minor of which are no longer mentioned there) or currently under discussion for deletion after being restored from re-directs. U-Mos (talk) 10:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- delete or even speedy delete, given the discussion/rationale for Template:WRJames and Template:Waterloo Road. Frietjes (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.