Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 2

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 1 November 3 >

November 2 edit

Template:Organisations for deaf people in Ireland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Organisations for deaf people in Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is not used, and has no likelihood of being used. Failedwizard (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox college debate societies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox college debate societies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox gattos organization edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Redrose64 (talk) 22:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox gattos organization (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and can be replaced by template:infobox organization. Frietjes (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox haul truck edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Redrose64 (talk) 22:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox haul truck (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox hhsaa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Redrose64 (talk) 22:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox hhsaa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused hardcoded infobox. Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox hot spring/main edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Redrose64 (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox hot spring/main (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused subtemplate of Infobox hot spring. Frietjes (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox inland water transport route edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox inland water transport route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox international football competition qualification edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox international football competition qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused fork of template:Infobox international football competition. Frietjes (talk) 17:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox international quidditch competition edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox international quidditch competition (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused copy of template:Infobox international football competition. Frietjes (talk) 17:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox internet by country edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox internet by country (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox language/terminological edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:56, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox language/terminological (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox language/basic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox language/extinct (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox language/sign (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox language/SIL14 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused subtemplate. Frietjes (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox station/Header MOSMETRO edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused. Redrose64 (talk) 11:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox station/Header MOSMETRO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox symphony edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox symphony (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused template. it was nominated back in 2008, shortly after its creation. Frietjes (talk) 17:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unused; a symphony is essentially any musical piece considering there is variation between symphonies themselves that there is no distinction comparable to other musical works.Curb Chain (talk) 21:49, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite gold platin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:05, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite gold platin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template, which I created, has now been incorporated into the much broader {{cite certification}}. The new template supports exactly the same format, only requiring an additional |region=Germany. I have already replaced all occurrences in the main space with the new template. Development now continues only with the new template, so I suggest this older template be removed. Muhandes (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is redundant then it falls under T3. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 12:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is redundant, but as the template had very wide use, I am opening discussion in case other editors do not agree. --Muhandes (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Whymerge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Whymerge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. "Why should this article be merged" should be part of the merge discussion created by the standard merge templates. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 12:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment there is no standard template for merger discussions. Perhaps someone should rectify that. 65.94.77.11 (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Revolution Software edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 07:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Revolution Software (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template of a stillborn WikiProject that will likely not gain any steam as its creator has been indefinitely blocked for significant WP:COMPETENCE issues. –MuZemike 11:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Incorrect License Location edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Incorrect License Location (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant since it duplicates the functionality of {{File other}} (formerly {{Image other}}). Most existing license templates are already using {{Image other}} to notify of improper namespace. Template is currently unused. —RP88 (talk) 08:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Foster the People edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. May also qualify under WP:CSD#G4 (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 August 3#Template:Foster the People): one extra single, without a full article to link to, makes it "a sufficiently identical and unimproved copy" to my mind. Redrose64 (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foster the People (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Textbook WP:NENAN. Even moreso after I boldly merged the discography, which includes all of two singles at this point. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Book cover fur edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 07:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Book cover fur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is depreciated and should be dropped in favor of {{Non-free use rationale book cover}} Phearson (talk) 02:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probably you mean deprecated. Dicklyon (talk) 03:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. Not transcluded on any file description pages, so just redirect the title over and be done with it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_2&oldid=1078566997"