Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 17

< May 16	May 18 >

May 17 edit

Template:Talkpage at commons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talkpage at commons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Relatively unused, see Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Talkpage at commons. Unnecessary because there are already lots of talkpages about files on Commons, that may just be because of image-related templates like {{FeaturedPicture}} or {{bad image}}. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 23:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Isn't that why this template is needed? Because the talk pages are on commons? If a talk page is created here for a file on commons, then this should get slapped on it, and the talk that has occurred moved to commons. 65.95.13.213 (talk) 03:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, what if a file on commons has a local template slapped on it, like the ones I mentioned above? That would merit the creation of a local talkpage. And anyway, there are already thousands of local "orphaned" talkpages of files on commons; we aren't going to slap this template to every one of them, are we? :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 04:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
comment Wouldn't {{soft redirect}} serve the same purpose? Maybe delete on redundancy grounds. hbdragon88 (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete as replacable by a soft redirect per Hbdragon88. Frietjes (talk) 22:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free physical media image edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Non-free physical media image (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seemingly unused license tag, whose function is now met by other more specific templates. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Camp Mulla edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Camp Mulla (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Premature navbox. Links to only two songs, themselves of questionable notability. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template links to only two songs because the group have not released many singles yet. And I don't understand how the singles are of questionable notability; if the group itself is notable enough to stay on Wikipedia, then so are it's songs. Davykamanzi (talk) 18:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not true, per WP:MUSIC, each song and album must itself be notable, in order to have an article. There are many, many songs on Wikipedia that do not have articles, because they're just songs: they didn't chart, there isn't any commentary or reception to scource, no details on the musical structure and background of the song; there's no material to write an article about it. hbdragon88 (talk) 07:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete, until there are more articles. For now a "see also" section or succession box will suffice. Frietjes (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Indianapolis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Indianapolis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded template. WikiProject Indianapolis has been converted into a task force of WikiProject Indiana. JJ98 (Talk) 18:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --Kumioko (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cleanup-sect edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-sect (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redirect to deprecated template, Only 1 usage in userspace which could be tidied up. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as long as {{cleanup section}} exists, this should exist. 65.95.13.213 (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, redirects are nominated at WP:RFD not here. Frietjes (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Section cleanup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Section cleanup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redirect to deprecated template, Unused... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as long as {{cleanup section}} exists, this should exist. 65.95.13.213 (talk) 04:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, redirects are nominated at WP:RFD not here. Frietjes (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sect-Cleanup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sect-Cleanup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redirect to deprecated template, Unused... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as long as {{cleanup section}} exists, this should exist. 65.95.13.213 (talk) 04:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close, redirects are nominated at WP:RFD not here. Frietjes (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DisneyChannel1997 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DisneyChannel1997 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel1998 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel1999 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2000 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2001 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2002 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2003 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2006 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2007 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:DisneyChannel2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The scope of these templates are already handled by Template:Disney Channel Original Series and Template:Disney Channel Original Movies. Windows72106 (talk) 12:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are a great use,they serve as a archieve and make it easier to view movies and shows together,its a gtreat reference guide and therefore should be kept. 744cody (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A couple of series and films released per year do not need a unique template. We already have main templates for that purpose. --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. --Kumioko (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. They're not really needed --DisneyFriends (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mauros to Stephanos Keglevich de Porychane edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mauros to Stephanos Keglevich de Porychane (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blatant OR and SYNTH per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descendants of Mauros from Miletus. Constantine ✍ 11:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Looks like only the bottom 4 generations have any chance at accuracy. Agricolae (talk) 01:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ifnot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ifnot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Extremely outdated, unused template that was previously constructed from Template:Qif before the introduction of ParserFunctions. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are some documentation at mediawiki that indicates that in some cases parserfunctions don't work and to use qif/if/ifnot constructions instead... (multi-substitution if constructions, if I remember correctly) 65.95.13.213 (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:If example 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:If example 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:If example 1/b (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:If example 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:If example 2a (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:If example 2b (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Qif example 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Qif example 1/b (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Qif example 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Qif example 2/b (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Qif example 2a (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Qif example 2b (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old tests Template:Qif before the introduction of ParserFunctions. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ifeq edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ifeq (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{if|eq|foo...}} which provides the same functionality. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ifexist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ifexist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{if|exist|foo...}} which provides the same functionality. Also unused. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.