Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 March 1
| < February 28 | March 2 > |
|---|
March 1 edit
Template:NF-Board teams edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Please close this discussion as keep, I have now edited the template. Stu.W UK (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Template:NF-Board teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template is full of unlinked teams, most of which have been deleted articles. Stu.W UK (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. Please close this discussion as keep, I have now edited the template. Stu.W UK (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Rubicon episodes edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
All the episodes were redirected to the episode list for failing WP:NOTABILITY, WP:PLOT. I waited a couple days to give those we wanted to oppose the redirects to do so, no-one did. With the articles redirected this navbox has no purpose. Xeworlebi (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the nominator. The navbox redirects merely to a list of episodes not an article pertaining to each individual episode. I think the current list is sufficient. —ASPENSTI—TALK—CONTRIBUTIONS 16:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.