Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 July 23

July 23 edit

Template:HexadecimalDigit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HexadecimalDigit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

(1) unused and (2) redundant to more general templates like {{Decimal2Base}} and others. 204.239.250.1 (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I originally intended to use this template for the template {{ConvertToBaseI}} which I started to develop before I realized that the method I used wouldn't work. to pass HexadecimalDigit in the digitset​ parameter would be a simple way to tell the template to write the digits using Hexadecimal notation. I guess HexadecimalDigit won't be needed now though. —Kri (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Power edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Power (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

(1) All it does is enclose the second parameter in a "sup" tag, (2) It is unused, (3) There are plenty of other templates for creating exponents in various forms like {{sup}} and {{val}} and {{e}} and others. We don't need this one. 204.239.250.1 (talk) 21:18, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep "e" and "val" are considerably different from this template. However, you can probably merge "e" to "val", since "val" seems to include "e"s functionality. 70.24.248.237 (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment expanding "val" to accept bases other than base-10 would be good, so merging this to "val" also is a possibility. 70.24.248.237 (talk) 09:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unused and redundant to {{sup}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ConvertToBaseI edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ConvertToBaseI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

(1) This template does not do what it says it does. (2) It is hopelessly broken, since it uses recursion, which is not allowed, and has placed this template in a category for such broken templates, (3) It appears to be redundant to other templates which do work like {{Decimal2Base}}, and (4) It is not clear why we need it anyway. 204.239.250.1 (talk) 21:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Think Tank edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Think Tank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few articles navigated. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 19:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Boy Scout Councils in Georgia (U.S. State) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boy Scout Councils in Georgia (U.S. State) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Local councils of the Boy Scouts of America are already covered by {{Scoutorg BSA}}. Of the active councils listed, only two have articles— the rest are redirects. Disbanded councils should redirect to current councils. Camps and lodges generally don't have articles as they are not separate entities. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 16:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per standing policy. I tried to do this two months ago, apparently I formatted the deletion request wrong.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Essex bus route 213 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Essex bus route 213 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Essex bus route 500 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Essex bus route 541 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These bus routes do not have their own articles. They are confined to a single row in a table at List of bus routes in Essex. Hence, there is nowhere for these route maps to go. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:European Parliament election, 2004 (France West) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:European Parliament election, 2004 (France West) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No suitable article where this information can be placed. A table for the entirety of France is present at European Parliament election, 2004 (France). — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:European Overseas Empire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:European Overseas Empire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Broken. Unused. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Evergreen Public Schools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Evergreen Public Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN: barely worthy of a navbox. I'm happy to be swayed towards the contrary, though. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Evolution essentials edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted (WP:G7). — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Evolution essentials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A piece of an article (Introduction to evolution) sitting in template space. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of the template, I agree with This, that and the other above. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ex-td edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was (speedy) deleted. Unused and author approval (close enough to author request, I guess). Nabla (talk) 01:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ex-td (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused formatting template. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete (as creator), unless someone has a use for it. I documented it better in case it is useful after all, but it and its underlying code are no longer even used in the non-article page it was created to clean up. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 01:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per author approval. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Expect Kaos! edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Expect Kaos! (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Expect Kaos (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two equally useless navboxes. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FAC/experiment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FAC/experiment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old experiment from inactive user. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Faraklata edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Faraklata (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to Faraklata. Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.