Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 July 10

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 9 July 11 >

July 10 edit

Template:Insomnia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Insomnia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. ᑲᓇᑕᒥ (talk) 21:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location map Atlanta, Georgia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moved to Template:Location map United States Atlanta Central to this location. JPG-GR (talk) 17:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map Atlanta, Georgia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of {{Location map United States Atlanta Central}}. Presidentman talk·contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 19:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move Atlanta Central to Location map Atlanta, Georgia. Delete what's presently there to make room for move Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 19:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nihongo title edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst then delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nihongo title (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Template:Nihongo with the addition of bold-italic, which should be applied on the article level to begin with. —Farix (t | c) 18:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per comments by TheFarix – very simple Wiki markup (five apostrophes in a row). Will take some effort to fix the pages where this is in use, though. Prime Blue (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. First would be to change the template's code to {{Nihongo|'''''{{{1}}}'''''|{{{2|}}}|{{{3|}}}}} and then subset all the transclusions. —Farix (t | c) 01:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Railer-man (talk) 19:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Doesn't seem practical to have a completely different template just to bold the title, which can be easily done anyways. Blake (Talk·Edits) 14:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the creator, I guess I am cool with the deletion. The main differentiating feature originally is not the italics, but that I made sure that the "?" didn't show up in print documents. Since that has been fixed in the main template, there isn't much need for this one. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of deleting, is it possible to redirect Nihongo_title to Nihongo? The reason being, a lot of articles use the N_T template and it would cause a bit of an eyesore if it stopped functioning. Is there a way we can get a bot to go around and reliably replace it? If not, I figure simply redirecting might save us some work? Would it still function? Do they use the same variables? AweCo (talk) 03:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As stated by Farix above, it should be relatively easy to replace the template. Blake (Talk·Edits) 22:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:32TeamX4RoundBracket3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32TeamX4RoundBracket3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Rcsprinter (talk) 12:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_July_10&oldid=1138695116"