Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 13

December 13 edit

Template:Failing GAN edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Failing GAN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unlinked, probably useless template Bulwersator (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI the template is meant to be substituted, so that's why there are few transclusions for it. I don't know how often it's still used now, though. Gary King (talk · scripts) 17:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is unlikely that it is used by anyone except creator, as it is completely unlinked Bulwersator (talk) 19:05, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fall of the Serbian Empire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:09, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fall of the Serbian Empire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nominated for deletion as unused and left as "no consensus", still unused Bulwersator (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NP-NPC coalition/meta/shortname edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete along with Template:NP-NPC coalition/meta/color, which was nominated in a prior discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NP-NPC coalition/meta/shortname (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is unused. –HTD 14:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are hundreds of these "meta/shortname" and "meta/color" templates lying around, unused. I really fail to understand why they aren't subpages of a template like "Template:Party shortname/NP-NPC coalition". It's a total mess. The unused ones should all be deleted under G6. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Turkish cuisine/beverage/alcohol edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as an exact duplicate. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkish cuisine/beverage/alcohol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Strange unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 08:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dhaka Premier League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:09, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dhaka Premier League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 13:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Development of a stutter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Development of a stutter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

inappropriate use of template namespace Bulwersator (talk) 07:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Detini edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Detini (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Swine flu reporting bias edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move without redirect. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Swine flu reporting bias (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, empty page, older revisions were inappropriate use of template namespace. Bulwersator (talk) 07:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was the content merged? I.E. are there attribution concerns? Rich Farmbrough, 14:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Deltools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deltools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused metanavbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment hmm, weird, I remember this being in lots of places before... was it replaced? 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Delhi Airport Metro Express Route edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Delhi Airport Metro Express Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused on Delhi Airport Metro Express. Talk page notification Bulwersator (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dearne Valley Railway RDT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Dearne Valley Railway RDT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in Dearne Valley Railway. I added notification on Talk:Dearne_Valley_Railway. Bulwersator (talk) 07:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I totally forgot to add it to the article. As I recall, I was looking for additional features to put in the RDT prior to adding it to Dearne Valley Railway, but I got sidetracked. Have now put it in the article. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It is the route diagram for the associated article. Keith D (talk) 13:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep, as now it is used Bulwersator (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Defensor Sporting squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Defensor Sporting squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, outdated navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.