Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 30

< April 29	May 1 >

April 30 edit

Template:Caption2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Caption2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recently created and redundant to Template:Caption Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Image class2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Image class2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recently created template, redundant to the existing Template:Image class Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy of the Template but enables templates to hold a Coat of Arms image in Infoboxes, as I'm trying to role out on all the Pope related pages. This will also extend to all the bishops, cardinals and priests in the catholic church. Mangwanani ^(talk) 19:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template has zero transclusions in article space, so I doubt it is needed. In addition, Template:Infobox manner of address, Template:Infobox settlement, and many other display Coat of Arms without using it. I see no reason why it is needed at all. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a misguided experiment of an editor who is unaware of how templates work. Frietjes (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CoA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CoA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be a verbatim copy of Template:Image. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy of the Template but enables templates to hold a Coat of Arms image in Infoboxes, as I'm trying to role out on all the Pope related pages. This will also extend to all the bishops, cardinals and priests in the catholic church. Mangwanani ^(talk) 19:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is deleted, perhaps the person deleting it would care to properly format Template:Infobox Christian leader so that the deletion of this Template doesn't mess up every single page that the Infobox is used on.................? Mangwanani ^(talk) 19:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The template has zero transclusions in article space, so I doubt it is needed. There is nothing to properly format. In addition, Template:Infobox manner of address, Template:Infobox settlement, and many other display Coat of Arms without using it. I see no reason why it is needed at all. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a misguided experiment of an editor who is unaware of how templates work. Frietjes (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Round16-2legs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Round16-2legs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not being used (no transclusions) by any article/tournament. Should be deleted as it is no longer needed as better brackets exist. MicroX (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — I proposed this template for deletion but I think I may have found a use for this template. --MicroX (talk) 05:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - "not being used"? I suggest you check the following editions of Copa Libertadores: 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008. Garavello (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — I put them there. Check the history of those pages. This is why I want to withdraw the nomination. --MicroX (talk) 01:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox VR station edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox VR station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template, transclusions migrated to {{Infobox station}} Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - all migrated to the standard infobox. Sw2nd (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BLP IMDB-only refimprove edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BLP IMDB-only refimprove (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template, Transclusions migrated per depreciation notice Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canada CP 2001 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canada CP 2001 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template, No transculsions, as template has been migrated to {{Canada_census}} Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created this template back in 2004 just for the 2001 census data. The {{Canada_census}} template handles multiple census years so this specific year template can now be deleted as all uses of it have been migrated. RedWolf (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as all of this templates uses have been migrated to {{Canada census}} and this template has also been deprecated.A520 | Talk me away! 09:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Exit sign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Exit sign (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old template that is not in use. (The only transclusions were at the top of a section in a talk page archive that I have subst-ed.) Since the purpose of this template is to replicate the appearance of an exit sign, which is not something used in articles in place of an actual photo, its utility is non-existent. Imzadi 1979 → 06:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Template has no use. Dough 48 72 23:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Kinda nifty, but serves no useful purpose. -- LJ ↗ 03:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Millennium Technology Prize laureate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Millennium Technology Prize laureate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is really not something that should be its own separate infobox. Template:Infobox person would be better, or any more other general infobox relating to the field in which the person worked. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:38, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Bay of Gibraltar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Bay of Gibraltar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was used only on a single article. Now Bay of Gibraltar uses the standard Template:Infobox bay. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:38, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 17:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Social indicators edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Social indicators (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only in one article, a rather haphazard selection of statistics to include, we already have Template:Infobox country demographics which does a better job. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lightmouse (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.