Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 1

April 1 edit

Template:Roman name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roman name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unuseful template, explaining what should be explained in text, if at all. To add to its problems, it is used at Vespasian, prodcing, "Vespasian is a Roman name"; it isn't. Vespasian is the English name of a Roman Emperor. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as nom; the joke deletion request is below. Despite the date, this is serious. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. If the nomenclature needs to be explained, the template is inadequate. If the name requires no explanation, the template is redundant. Since many Roman biographies need disambiguating or other top notes, the template adds distracting clutter at the beginning of the article. I inquired at the Classical Greece & Rome project, and no one seemed to know its origin or purpose. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Nom and Cynwolfe seem to have covered it, particularly if the project doesn't know about it. Dougweller (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per above. Paul August 16:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Citation needed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was  . Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 01:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 
This is an April Fool's nomination
Template:Citation needed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Because nothing is ever wrong on Wikipedia.[citation needed] Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 11:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Modern pentathlete edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Modern pentathlete (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. It's just a copy of {{Infobox sportsperson}}. I could send it for T3 too. Magioladitis (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NFLContract edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NFLContract (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I think Template:Infobox NFL player doesn't use contract anymore making this template useless. Magioladitis (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.