Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 September 8

< September 7	September 9 >

September 8 edit

Template:Infobox combined fighting record edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox combined fighting record (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan. I am not sure if it was ever used. Magioladitis (talk) 13:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unused and presumably deprecated. PC78 (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Infobox adult xxx edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge, the external links issue can be resolved in a separate discussion. They appear to have some utility as a source for the information presented within the box. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox adult male (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox adult female (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox adult biography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox adult male and Template:Infobox adult female with Template:Infobox adult biography.
No reason to have different templates for males and females. After merging we can delete the separate infoboxes. (If we still think the separate infoboxes should exist then we should delete the target infobox) -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support overdue merge into a single template; no need for the separation when one template does the job just fine. This is perhaps not the place, but is there any good reason for the infobox to link such things as "birth date", "height", "weight", etc? PC78 (talk) 14:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking to start this discussion afterwards. All three templates need cleanup. "shoe size"?? -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support I've only edited one adult article before, Taylor Vixen, and I've found that the infobox information like height and weight is kind of a crapshoot. People just come around and add in seemingly arbitrary figures that don't really matter one way or another. Beyond that point though, it seems rather random that there are three separate templates, they should definitely be merged. Nomader ^(Talk) 03:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tabercil (talk) 19:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All parameters that links to external sites (iafd, egafd, bgafd, imdb, afdb) must be removed. There is a strong consensus on that that was implemented to all other infoboxes. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Copyviourl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Copyviourl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, of no obvious utility. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's not obvious what this thing is for, or how it might be useful. Unused in any case. PC78 (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.