Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 September 22

< September 21	September 23 >

September 22 edit

Template:WikiProjectLink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProjectLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:WikiProjectLink1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Ancient category talk page template that only serves to promote WikiProjects, with only a handful of uses. Replaceable with and entirely redundant to specific WikiProject banners. PC78 (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I checked all the pages which used the template, in every case there was a corresponding project banner it could be replace with. I've replaced them all so the templates have no further use.--Salix (talk): 23:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox digicam edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox digicam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox camera (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox digicam with Template:Infobox camera.
Sufficiently similar that one infobox should be able to accomodate both. Bsherr (talk) 06:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. We only need one camera infobox. PC78 (talk) 23:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell where technicalities of merge of {{Infobox Camera}} into {{Infobox camera}} are being discussed. There is a clear divide between digital and optical cameras, but there is much in common and a template could easily have optional parameters. The merge will include a large expansion of {{Infobox camera}} which currently has fewer parameters. --Salix (talk): 08:57, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MyTitle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G4. Jujutacular ^talk 14:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MyTitle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 24. Now back, still redundant with the magic words, and doesn't seem to work at the one transclusion that exists. Bsherr (talk) 06:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G4 as a repost of material previously deleted at TfD? PC78 (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe. I can't see the previous page to judge its similarity. --Bsherr (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jungle Junction edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jungle Junction (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The majority of this template leads to nothing and is being wasted. None of the characters have their own pages, nor will they most likely ever. The only episodes that are listed are the first and second part of the first episode and the first and second part of the Christmas episode and each section links to the episode and character pages that can be found on the main page anyway. HalfShadow 16:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, WP:NENAN. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sandy Leah edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sandy Leah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I see no reason for this template. Only four links are working, one of them being a redirect and another leading to an unrelated page. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 20:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ - Seems to assist navigation. Perhaps red links should be removed. --Bsherr (talk) 04:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To remove red links would mean to remove almost all of the links, leaving only four: one to the singer, one to the duo she had with her brother, one for an unrelated article, and one redirect. I don't see a template like this one as useful... Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 00:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Neutral --Bsherr (talk) 06:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only four blue links, and only two of them are related to the subject. That's not enough to make this a useful navigation tool. PC78 (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no enough blue link to justify template.--Salix (talk): 23:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.