Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 28

< November 27	November 29 >

November 28 edit

Template:Campaignbox Arab-Israeli conflict edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and replace with Template:Arab-Israeli conflict engagements (or its parent). Ruslik_Zero 19:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Arab-Israeli conflict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Campaignboxes are designed for campaigns within a larger war. I think it stretches the concept too far to consider the Arab–Israeli conflict as a single war (of which wars like the Yom Kippur War and Six-Day War are mere campaigns). It's much more nuanced, and Template:Arab-Israeli conflict engagements, which is a child of the larger Template:Arab–Israeli conflict, serves the subject much better. It's different in that it's a navbox, but it repeats all of the contents of this template. I propose this template is therefore redundant, and that a campaignbox for the Arab–Isreali conflict (not "Arab–Isreali war") is incorrect. Bsherr (talk) 21:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. However, this Template:Arab-Israeli conflict engagements should be added in replacement to this Template:Campaignbox Arab-Israeli conflict in every article where appears.--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure. That'll have to be done manually since one appears in the top section and the other at the bottom of the article. But we can designate it in the holding cell for review instead of immediately to orphaning. --Bsherr (talk) 22:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the polites of the Arab-Isreali conflict have been in a state of war with isreal since 1948 (Syria), or were for lengthy periods of time (Egypt, Jordan). Thus from one point of view the arab isreali conflict can be seen as one great war with several bouts of fighting in the same manner as the hundred years war.XavierGreen (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge that's a possible viewpoint, but, at the minimum, if it is legitimate, it ought to be first included in the lede of the Arab–Israeli conflict article, and sourced, before considered in the design of templates on the topic. --Bsherr (talk) 16:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of some military operations (not only wars) and the exclusion of other bouts of fighting in this template is totally arbitrary. This is the only complete template that should be included in every article about Arab-Israeli engagements.--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Family Guy character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Family Guy character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, I doubt it will be used in Family Guy related articles. JJ98 (Talk) 17:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant to Template:Infobox character. --Bsherr (talk) 22:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused, not needed. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused and redundant. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 18:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, this one was orphaned by Plastikspork last month. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 19:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.