Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 26

< November 25	November 27 >

November 26 edit

Template:Request accepted edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Unblock reviewed (non-admin closure). Hey Mid (contribs) 10:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Request accepted (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, redundant, and only used on a few dozen pages. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is specifically an unblock template for user talk pages, and as such is supposed to be substed. Thus it won't show as having been used many places specifically because it's been substed. I do, however, see it used quite a bit, and would hate to lose it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Oh, and those pages where it is actually transcluded are instances where it should actually be substed. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]
Delete. Oh, it's deprecated, and replaced with a better template. Looks like we can dispense with this one, then, unless someone can come up with a really compelling reason to keep it around. Substitute the transclusions and be done with it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, there are no transclusions. —mc10 (u|t|c) 21:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but redirect it to Template:Unblock reviewed. As the rest of the transclusions have now been substed, I think it's OK to redirect it, but I think the edit history should be kept for historical purposes. Hey Mid (contribs) 18:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, per Heymid. History goes back to 2006. Rehman 12:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:To My Surprise edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:To My Surprise (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates the main article, one member, and one album (with none likely to follow.) The other three are articles that simply have one band member in common. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom and TenPoundHammer. Rehman 12:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User space draft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as test-page. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User space draft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be a user draft created as a template. -— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 15:19, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment shouldn't that redirect to {{Userspace-draft}} ? 64.229.102.230 (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anticholinesterases edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was closed as out of scope. Template redirects should be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, not here. Nonadministrator closure. Bsherr (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anticholinesterases (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been redirecting to Template:Cholinergics for a long time. I just cleaned up all redirects, so nothing points here anymore. MichaK (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Parasympathomimetics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was closed as out of scope. Template redirects should be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, not here. Nonadministrator closure. Bsherr (talk) 20:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Parasympathomimetics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been redirecting to Template:Cholinergics for a long time. I just cleaned up all redirects, so nothing points here anymore. MichaK (talk) 14:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Order of the Stick edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was clear delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Order of the Stick (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Due to every article this template links to, ignoring the header, having been merged into one article, its uses are small. Back when we had articles for each of the main characters, I can understand why this article was created, but now... its hardly got any articles to link to. Harry Blue5 (talk) 13:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Now unneeded. --Bsherr (talk) 20:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Unnecessary. EdJohnston (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it is now unneeded. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 00:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Talkback subst edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talkback subst (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is {{talkback}}, but with a timestamp. Since {{talkback}} already does this (albeit by a parameter, unless you use Twinkle/Friendly, in which case it's automatically added), the template is redundant. Also, the template's ostensible purpose is to provide a version of {{talkback}} that must be subst'ed, but there's nothing in the template that forces a subst. cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 09:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I was the original creator of this fork. I remember it being redirected to the main template, but I do not recall it being forked again. The current fork seems to be redundant to the original template, so it doesn't seem useful. —mc10 (u|t|c) 04:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kosovo-mountain-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7. NAC. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 14:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kosovo-mountain-stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate stub template which contains prewritten text and references. Not so much text should be provided by a single template because it prevents editors from editing the text. Moreover, it makes references more difficult to be updated. (Note that generated text contains duplicated text too but I guess this is fixable). Magioladitis (talk) 00:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Also, note here {{KosovoMountainInRangeStub}}, almost the same template that was used to template almost entire article content. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 12:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.