Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 24

< June 23	June 25 >

June 24 edit

Template:Good Luck Charlie edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork (talk) 16:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Good Luck Charlie (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Underpopulated template. Only 3 links including the main article. AussieLegend (talk) 19:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not everything needs a navbox. The list of characters has been merged and the list of episodes is linked within the main article. --LoЯd ۞pεth 22:33, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nofuture3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nofuture3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless, unnecessary template AussieLegend (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of discussion at #template:nofuture:

This isn't pointless. It tells users NOT to add future events. I created Template:Nofuture2 and Template:Nofuture3 because I didn't know how to make this:

I do agree, it is not widely used, but it should be used for things like upcoming seasons or tournaments where it is not nessasry to post information. Hidividedby5 (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (userfy if you really want it), no need to be in the T: namespace. —mono 23:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As best I can tell, this is redundant to {{Crystal}}. I could be wrong, as the purpose and use is not documented. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 20:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just realized that {{Crystal}} does the exact same thing. Since it is not really used, I would say delete. Template:Nofuture, Template:Nofuture2, and Template:Nofuture3. hidividedby5 (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nofuture2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork (talk) 16:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nofuture2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless, unnecessary template AussieLegend (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of discussion at #template:nofuture:

This isn't pointless. It tells users NOT to add future events. I created Template:Nofuture2 and Template:Nofuture3 because I didn't know how to make this:

I do agree, it is not widely used, but it should be used for things like upcoming seasons or tournaments where it is not nessasry to post information. Hidividedby5 (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (userfy if you really want it), no need to be in the T: namespace. —mono 23:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As best I can tell, this is redundant to {{Crystal}}. I could be wrong, as the purpose and use is not documented. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 20:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just realized that {{Crystal}} does the exact same thing. Since it is not really used, I would say delete. Template:Nofuture, Template:Nofuture2, and Template:Nofuture3. hidividedby5 (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nofuture edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nofuture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless, unused template. AussieLegend (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't pointless. It tells users NOT to add future events. I created Template:Nofuture2 and Template:Nofuture3 because I didn't know how to make this:

I do agree, it is not widely used, but it should be used for things like upcoming seasons or tournaments where it is not nessasry to post information. Hidividedby5 (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (userfy if you really want it), no need to be in the T: namespace. —mono 23:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As best I can tell, this is redundant to {{Crystal}}. I could be wrong, as the purpose and use is not documented. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 20:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just realized that {{Crystal}} does the exact same thing. Since it is not really used, I would say delete. Template:Nofuture, Template:Nofuture2, and Template:Nofuture3. hidividedby5 (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Genchar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Genchar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Formerly used on List of FLCL characters, but now no longer used at all. Inferior to most character infoboxes. Axem Titanium (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—duplicates {{infobox character}} and not in use, so CSD T3-eligible. Imzadi 1979 → 06:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sentoff edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sentoff (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that contains only an image. Only link to the template is on one user talk page, where an administrator mentions it. AussieLegend (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Template:Sent off, perhaps. Digirami (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing to merge, a straight redirect seems more appropriate. --AussieLegend (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created it because on 2010 FIFA World Cup Group C someone made a typo in placing {{sentoff}} instead of the useful template {{sent off}}. The page was corrected immediately after {{sentoff}} was created, yet the template stayed. I created the template, and I believe that no redirect is nessasary, a delete would be more appropriate. Also, I have looked it up and nothing links to template:sentoff. Hidividedby5 (talk) 15:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.