Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 July 1

July 1

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GNH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used, wrongly categorized Si Trew (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:First (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template presumably is intended to link to an episode of the Muppets on wikia.com. However it is not actually used anywhere except on one template talk page and one user page, neither of which I believe in the correct context. The name is too general (should be muppets-wikia-episode or something) but considering it's not used anyway, might as well be deleted. Si Trew (talk) 14:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Left66 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Practically identical to Template:Left60, which was deleted. Basically a giant, unnecessarily complicated template that outputs "<div style=width:66%;>" that is no longer used at all. Axem Titanium (talk) 10:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per T3 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DivineAdoratrice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Similar to Template:GodsWife, this is hard-coded succession box with little usage. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skal vi danse? (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation template for basically one season (mostly red links) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox patriarch styles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to the generic {{Infobox manner of address}}. It was only being used in about 5 articles, so I replaced it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.