Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 22

< January 21	January 23 >

January 22 edit

Template:ASCB talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per db-author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ASCB talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template which is not likely to be used again given that 2008 has now past. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as creator; no further use. (I created this template as a temporary aid for monitoring articles that were being created at a wikipeda workshop during a professional conference in 2008.) Maralia (talk) 22:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AFC submission/namespace number edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn, sorry I didn't see that part of the code. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFC submission/namespace number (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned subtemplate which does not appear to be needed by {{AFC submission}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Actually..... we kind of need that in the template... fetchcomms☛ 22:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Code here fetchcomms☛ 22:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Keep, nomination appears to be a mistake. Used by Template:AFC_submission/submit. — The Earwig @ 22:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:911ct/Articles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per db-author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:911ct/Articles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:911ct/Audiovisual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:911ct/Books (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:911ct/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:911ct/Groups (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned subtemplates which appear to be redundant to the main {{911ct}}. Could be userfied or moved to WikiProject space if they are of some use there? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree These templates were transcluded to {{911ct supporters}} (see section below). I agree with the deletion. (I have created this template.) Cs32en Talk to me 22:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:911ct/Supporters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per db-author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:911ct/Supporters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template, appears to be a duplication of 911ct supporters? Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree It's not a duplicate, as it was transcluded to {{911ct supporters}}. I agree with the deletion. (I have created this template.) Cs32en Talk to me 22:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite attacks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted as a test. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite attacks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Apparently a test edit from March 2009 by an editor who was active for about a week in March 2009. No transclusions, no real content, and no use that I can see. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WWE Slammy Award Winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per prior discussion Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WWE Slammy Award Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An offshoot of Template:Slammy Award Winners, which was already deleted. TJ Spyke 16:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pp-protected/nazi party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pp-protected/nazi party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Protection template that does not represent any established policy or guideline that I am aware of. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - See discussion at Wikipedia talk:Protection policy#((pp-full-indef)) and comments at User talk:Nickidewbear#3RR and the section below that. --David Göthberg (talk) 10:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.