Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 29

< December 28	December 30 >

December 29 edit

Template:Infobox English public school edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox English public school (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used once. Could be replaced by {{Infobox school}} WOSlinker (talk) 23:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ~~Template:Infobox school~~ Template:Infobox UK school – It seems to have a substantial history. It may have been transcluded on numerous pages in the past. If it were deleted, page histories may be ruined. At least if it's redirected, it may save them slightly. McLerristarr | Mclay1 10:29, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If we redirect, it should redirect to Template:Infobox UK school. Mhiji (talk) 17:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes. Good one. McLerristarr | Mclay1 02:13, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Doshisha Business School edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per T3 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Doshisha Business School (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use Infobox that doesn't need to be a template WOSlinker (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redundant. –Moondyne 00:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant with {{tb}}. Either delete or merge, most likely delete. 184.144.170.217 (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Substitute and Strong Delete, per nom. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 23:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oil companies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oil companies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Petroleum industry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Oil companies with Template:Petroleum industry.
Template Petroleum industry includes also major oil companies (supermajors and NOCs). Therefore, right now the template Oil companies just duplicates part of the Petroleum industry template. Beagel (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging Template:Oil companies with Template:Petroleum industry.

Expanding and updating in the Major national oil companies section of Template:Petroleum industry.--Takamaxa (Talk) 02:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, the companies one is very short. 134.253.26.11 (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Science High Schools (Philippines) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Science High Schools (Philippines) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two instances; redundant to more generic schools infobox. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant. –Moondyne 00:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Places of Worship in North Malabar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Places of Worship in North Malabar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

While I don't object to a navigation template for Places of Worship in principle, this template does not in fact navigate between Places of Worship - there are only a couple of links leading to actual places of worship and all the rest navigate to cities and villages, making this redundant to Template:Major Towns of North Malabar Template:Kannur district and similar templates it always comes with. The links could also be considered misleading. Muhandes (talk) 07:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, only two links are to actual temples. 134.253.26.11 (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Australia school edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Australia school (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Australia school private (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Following discussions here and here, these templates are deprecated and no longer in use in any articles. Delete. All Australia school articles are now using {{Infobox school}} (see WP:EIAS for full listing). –Moondyne 07:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per T3. I also tagged for speedy deletion. Redirect to Template:Infobox school per Mclay1 below. --Muhandes (talk) 07:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template:Infobox school. If the template is deprecated, redirect it to the new template being used. There is no reason to delete. McLerristarr | Mclay1 16:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Louisville Bulls edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Louisville Bulls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigational template for a team whose article has been deleted at AFD. Courcelles 05:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete useless template. --Muhandes (talk) 07:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Jenks24 (talk) 08:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, won't be useful if the parent subject isn't eligible for an article. Nyttend (talk) 13:57, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MCFL teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MCFL teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All but one article of this template has been deleted. Useless and orphaned Courcelles 05:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete useless template. --Muhandes (talk) 07:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Greg Palast Investigations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Greg Palast Investigations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary navbox: there's no need for a navigational template to link only three articles, which can easily be linked to each other instead. Robofish (talk) 02:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not much navigation with two articles in the box, this just inflates pages. --Muhandes (talk) 07:51, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.