Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 9

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 8 August 10 >

August 9 edit

Template:Pittsburgh Metro Malls edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect. There was some sort of merge done earlier, and I think a histmerge is unnecessarily complicating things here, per Nyttend. Redirects are cheap. —fetch·comms 00:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pittsburgh Metro Malls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template duplicates the content of {{Pittsburgh Shopping}}.GrapedApe (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier brought up here, for the record. —Bill Price (nyb) 23:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as orphaned and completely redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 01:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as redundant. –Grondemar 04:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—inappropriate fork. Imzadi 1979 → 02:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to the other template, as I said at the Help Desk; it can't hurt anything to have this as a redirect, and by deleting it we'd mess up some things in various articles' histories. Nyttend (talk) 00:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Source edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Moved to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 August 10. Non-admin closure. –Grondemar 04:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Source (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see the usefulness of this template, and often see misuse of this template. example. If I am overlooking something, I hope someone politely points it out to me. If not, it should be deleted. :) Avicennasis @ 22:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - it is orphaned and currently redirects to {{Citation needed}}. Its name is misleading, hence the misuse. Airplaneman ✈ 01:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, but it should probably be at RfD instead of here, but either way, it's useless. Imzadi 1979 → 02:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the two delete !votes above are by the same user... Airplaneman ✈ 04:28, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not to be overly bureaucratic, but I'm going to close this discussion and list at RfD, as this page has been a redirect since its creation. –Grondemar 04:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:L.P.R. Brakes-Farnese Vini edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete —fetch·comms 00:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:L.P.R. Brakes-Farnese Vini (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and won't be used in the future as the team has folded. SeveroTC 20:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DFL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch·comms 00:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DFL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and will continue to be unused as team has folded. SeveroTC 20:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jyukai edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch·comms 00:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jyukai (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Effectively unused, it was created as a navigation box between the article for the band Jyukai and its albums, but the articles for the albums were deleted for lack of notability and the navigation box (now only on the band's article) only contains red links. -- Atama頭 20:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It's effectively a navbox with just one link, which makes it a rather pointless navebox. —Farix (t | c) 20:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - ineffective navbox. Airplaneman ✈ 00:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not useful. Imzadi 1979 → 02:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Doctorwhospecialbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch·comms 00:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Doctorwhospecialbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Infobox. All special episodes are currently using the standard {{Infobox Doctor Who episode}} template. WOSlinker (talk) 17:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cityferry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —fetch·comms 00:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cityferry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CityCat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused templates. d'oh! talk 09:12, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Re-use, then delete These templates were used in CityCat and CityFerry before these articles were merged into TransdevTSL Brisbane Ferries without including those templates. I suggest to merge the code of these templates (and possibly other material from those articles which is so far missing) into those articles; then they can be deleted. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - These templates are clunkier than the current navbox at the end of the article, {{Navbox TransLink (SEQ) ferry network}}, which contains the basic info (not all of it) from the two templates. Additionally, they were used in the "network" sections of their respective articles. Currently, there is a merge discussion ongoing here about the network discussion on the TransdevTSL page, where the two articles that used the template were merged to. I am about to go and support that discussion, as it seems better to merge the current wharf articles into the companie's page, rendering the info from the two templates listed above redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 01:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Start Brisbane City Council Ferries box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Start Brisbane City Council Ferries box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. d'oh! talk 09:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jinling Twelve Women edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per T3. It's been only 6 days, but consensus here is to delete anyway. —fetch·comms 00:52, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jinling Twelve Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Rudimentary template. I've already created a better one at Template:Dream of the Red Chamber. This older template can now be considered subseded and hence may be deleted. DORC (talk) 06:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you replace the transclusions on those pages, you can speedy T3 this as reproducing the function of the newer template. Axem Titanium (talk) 11:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Template orphaned, will request a T3. Airplaneman ✈ 01:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WP DIGI welcome message edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Archive. —fetch·comms 00:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP DIGI welcome message (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. The Wikiproject that this use to be a part of has been assimilated into WP:ANIME as an inactive work group. —Farix (t | c) 01:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_August_9&oldid=1141876603"