Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 21

< August 20	August 22 >

August 21 edit

Template:Double image stack edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 04:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Double image stack (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, redundant to {{Multiple image}}. I replaced about 100 instances between tonight and today and there are about 150 left.

Note Template has not been tagged, as it is protected. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. —Train2104 (talk · contribs · count · email) 21:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 06:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 19:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:QuoteAuthor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 04:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QuoteAuthor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As part of a new bot, this is no longer needed. —I-20 the highway 19:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox runner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 04:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox runner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated [in favour of {{Infobox athlete}}], c. 200 transclusions, which I am currently replacing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 06:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 07:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Nine World Wars edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 04:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Nine World Wars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Eurocentric NPOV on what wars are World War. Source is a 1980's American high school textbook listed in Lies My Teacher Told Me. This is the only source for the classification, which is never used. All in all no suffficient claim to notability of this classification, and serious doubts about the reliability/neutrality of the source . Arnoutf (talk) 09:15, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've told them before, this template is nonsense. Delete it. Rebel Redcoat (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure go ahead. I don't take this personally and am not offended. SpencerCS (talk) 21:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Context comment: SpencerCS is the original creator of the template, whom I notified of this discussion on his talk. Arnoutf (talk) 22:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Imzadi 1979 → 06:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Habap (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:XBLASummer2010 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep and move to Template:XBLA Summer of Arcade. Airplaneman ✈ 14:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:XBLASummer2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A seemingly pointless template. Not even an article for "Summer of Arcade" nor a "Summer of Arcade 2010" and header links to "Xbox Live", "Xbox Live Arcade", and "2010". Somewhat of a cruft template that doesn't do much more than link a few random games together. Jmlk 1 7 08:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - could easily be viewed as WP:ADVERT, plus there isn't a XBLA Summer 2010 article to establish the need for a template. If there's no coverage outside of Microsoft, then there's no need for a template. --Teancum (talk) 04:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Keep, Expand, and Move to Template:XBLA Summer of Arcade. Summer of Arcades have been widely covered by the media as seen in this WP:Video Games reliable sources search, however limiting it to the 2010 year seems a bit of WP:LISTCRUFT. Expanding the template to cover all years would provide more notability. The template seems to have been created by a semi-active user who did not know WP policies, but was acting in good faith. --Teancum (talk) 20:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded template to include all current years, pointed header to Xbox Live Arcade#Xbox 360 --Teancum (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ruby edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ruby (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated and unused. Renominated per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_January_24#Template:Ruby and alternately suggest incorporating {{ruby-zh-p}}, {{ruby-zh-b}}, and {{ruby-ja}} per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2009_December_4#Template:Ruby. E.g. {{ruby|ja|FOO}} can replace {{ruby-ja|FOO}}. Does this seem reasonable? If consensus is to fold these templates into one, then I will suggest deletion or redirection of the other three. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to {{Ruby}} adding a lang parameter to the Ruby template. Otherwise disable or delete Ruby as unnecessary. (Note: A disabled template has all content in <noinclude> tags.) – allen四names 11:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.