Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 11

< December 10	December 12 >

December 11 edit

Template:I-16 aux edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:I-16 aux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete - underpopulated navbox, used on just two articles, and effectively contains only one item. See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 4#Template:I-83 aux. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per same rationale to delete I-83 aux. ---Dough 48 72 15:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not enough links for a useful navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per rationale for Template:I-83 aux. --LJ (talk) 01:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the condition that the navboxes are replaced with the appropriate links (such as a link to I-516 on I-16 and a link to I-16 on I-516) necessary for navigation. – T M F 16:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you check the articles to make sure these links are absent before making such a condition? 81.111.114.131 (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Attica-expand edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Attica-expand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and seemingly abandoned, with no talk and no edits since it was created in 2008, and it links to a non-existent category. --RL0919 (talk) 05:09, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete malformed stub template. 76.66.192.35 (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Java class cruisers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Java class cruisers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links in this template are sections of the only article that contains it. Wholly unnecessary. bd2412 T 02:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Navigation template with nothing to navigate. Even if each link were a distinct article, three isn't enough to justify a navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 05:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.