Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 March 29

< March 28	March 30 >

March 29, 2006 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 22:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Montserrat infobox edit

Delete. It was reformatted/updated to the Template:Infobox Country form. Not needed. MJCdetroit 18:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above. Fishhead64 19:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Those other templates break to easily. I believe all the British Overseas territories use this template so you'll have more to fix if TfD. CaribDigita 20:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 10:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. Chairman S. ^Talk 21:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the template, move it out of the template namespace, and redirect to Montserrat. — Insta ntnood 21:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 22:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country infobox data Suriname edit

delete weird. --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete Fishhead64 19:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Created, obviously erroneously, by a bot. —Cuivi é nen, Thursday, 30 March 2006 @ 01:41 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete at author request --William Allen Simpson 03:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Swadesh 001 edit

Template:Swadesh 001 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Just one out of 207 meta-templates with the same name formula (Swadesh XXX) which serve only one purpose: to each stand for one word in other Swadesh list templates. Pretty much superfluous since the minimal amount of text can easily be included in the individual Swadesh templates. Consider this a discussion concerning all 207 of the minitemplates as group. Peter ^Isotalo 18:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - how bizarre! BD2412 T 18:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
delete useless --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete superfluous indeed! Fishhead64 19:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
wait Please wait a few days, until I get time to replace these mini-templates by the actual text in the 3 remaining Swadesh templates. I think there is no urgency to remove them right now, destroying that way some Swadesh list pages. Thanks. Croquant 07:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Go! You may delete them, replacement is finished. Croquant 13:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 22:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NIN halos edit

Template:NIN halos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I have merged the content of this template into Template:Nine Inch Nails, making this template redundant. See Template talk:Nine Inch Nails for more information. - Rynne 16:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --jh51681 16:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete ditto Fishhead64 19:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. Chairman S. ^Talk 22:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete definitely redundant --kernunrex 17:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 22:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Battle Tank edit

Delete, redundant infobox. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom, and afv is nicer looking imo anyway --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete agree with larsinio. Fishhead64 19:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete by Mark Sweep --William Allen Simpson 03:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Neo-Nazi edit

Too late... Speedied by MarkSweep already. Not that I wouldn't agree of course... this time... Misza13 ^{T C} 11:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I wish to explain why, I have made this sample. By means of these samples, I wish to show that I the adherent of that or other ideology. If somebody from users uses samples by means of which they show, that they are - communists, liberals, bisexuals, homosexuals etc. Why I can not use this sample for showing that I'm Neo-Nazi? Why this sample is racist or anti-semitic? This sample carries only the informative purpose, and don't consist of any racist & antisemitic things. I consider, that your behaviour is a display of some kind of xenofobia or "racism". Thanks,

Sincerely Your, SteveGOLD

- - If you wish to keep it, you may of course contest the deletion through appropiate channels. However you may wish to read WP:POINT and WP:NPA. In any case, my vote would have been delete due to the inflammatory nature. CharonX 22:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Gee, isn't this funny. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad this one's gone, but I'm sorry, folks, this biased deletion process has got to be revised. The Template:User_Communist box was nom. for speedy deletion, but lo and behold, someone removed the tag. This one is resurrected and killed regularly. Just because Communism still has supporters doesn't mean it isn't JUST as divisive. Please be fair and delete ALL divisive or political Userboxes. Nhprman ^UserLists 04:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete by Mark Sweep --William Allen Simpson 03:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Neo-Fascist edit

Too late... Speedied by MarkSweep already. Not that I wouldn't agree of course... this time... Misza 13 ^{T C} 11:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 22:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Troll edit

abstain, as creator; I created it because I found it useful, unaware of the precedent tfd; see [1] dab (ᛏ) 15:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The template deleted was quite different from this. If some stuff is created over and over again by various editors, it's a sure sign that the stuff is needed in Wikipedia. Currently, the project experiences a monstrous influx of trolls. I believe the template is quite useful in letting other wikipedians know that they shouldn't bother to respond to trolls clamoring for attention. Hence, Keep. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 15:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and in if doubt, look at how it is used. I'd recommend going over the 'what links here' - it is likely quite a few users may be warned for making personal attacks involving this template.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the nominator abakharev 16:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Piotr. Christopher Parham (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete against policy --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 18:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete the Troll looks like a Leprechaun. Mike McGregor (Can) 09:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Misza 13 ^{T C} 11:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the image does not portray a real troll. (And for various valid reasons expressed above.) —Cuivi é nen, Saturday, 1 April 2006 @ 19:25 (UTC)
Delete, personal attack template. --Ter e nc e Ong 06:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ghirla; delete abusers. No more MPA than a reference to WP:DNFT. Septentrionalis 20:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Hawkestone 23:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.