Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/August/20

< Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion‎ | Log‎ | 2009/August

August 20

edit

Category:First aid stubs/{{FirstAid-stub}}

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deleted. –xenotalk 17:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


No articles categorized here, scan shows that there aren't many articles for this category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Template is miscapitalised, and the subject is already thoroughly covered by other stub types. Grutness...wha? 23:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete as unused. Waacstats (talk) 08:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Empty stub categories

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was individual cases dealt with as listed below


I propose deleting these empty categories and templates. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of a trainwreck developing here... These are different cases and need to be treated separately:
  • Swaminarayan Stubs - unproposed, miscapitalised, no template, already covered by Hindu-stub. Delete
  • Percy Jackson stubs - unproposed, badly-named template, misnamed category (equivalent permcat is at Category:Percy Jackson and the Olympians), and too narrow a subject (permcat has only 18 articles... chances are that fewer than 60 of them are stubs). Delete
  • Category redirects should never exist for stub categories (there's no need for them since stub categories are always populated by templates). However, their existence is often a warning of deeper problems. In two of these cases, a stub category has been renamed without proposal, so deletion isn't the primary option here; discussion on which is the correct name is. Relist for discussion. The third (the Napoleonic one) was renamed after discusssion at WPSS and can be speedily deleted.
  • Croatia B&S stubs can possibly be populated. There are currently some 48 stubs marked with croatia-struct-stub - finding another twelve seems possible. Either populate or reupmerge (yeah, I know, upmerge sounds odd for an empty category, but the equivalent template exists and is in use) delete per Waacstats' comments. Good catch WS.
  • African academic biography stubs is unproposed, but not too silly an idea, given that the main way of splitting academics is by nationality. As such, this could be a useful holding category for academics from the various african countries which have not yet got separate categories (all of them!). However, the usual principle with current stub-sorting is to have templates for individual countries, not continents, so this may be a case of fill the category using appropriate nation-specific templates, delete the continent-wide template.
Grutness...wha? 23:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC) (amended 22:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]
  • Swaminarayan Stubs - delete we don't split Hindism by sects
  • Napolenic wars (1792-1815) stubs - I remember sme discussion on this and trust G's memory/looking up so speedy delete
  • Croaita building and structure stubs - delete as misnamed Category:Croatian building and structure stubs already has 80+ articles
  • Gardening stubs - redirecting to a perm cat therefore delete and we already have horticulture stubs
  • A Series of Unfortunate Events stubs - I'd say delete and nominate the Lemont Snicket cat for deletion as well.
  • Percy Jackson stubs -delete as small and unlikely to grow
  • African academic biography stubs - I'll look at populating this week if time arises before any deletion.
Hope that covers them all. Waacstats (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2009/August/20&oldid=1045983203"