Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 64

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 60 ← Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 → Archive 70

Susanna Cappellaro

Deleted via PROD. I would like to have the opportunity to improve the page -Richppattison (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Scouts Canada.svg

There was no justification for user:Tawker to have speedy deleted this file. It was a perfect svg representation (not "older" as claimed) of the Scouts Canada emblem. Emblems are used in infoboxes, not "logos" or current branding. Nothing was significantly different from the smaller, lower quality logo being foisted now. Please restore it, and consider the Scouting WPMOS, which is aiming toward svgification of all Scout national emblems. Again, a discussion was warranted before user:Tawker did this unilateral move. The emblem _was_ in use, and was deleted without proper discussion. Please restore. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Image above has fair use image violation issues, according to Wikipedia:Logos we need to use lowest res version possible for fairuse. MOS states nothing as to usage of emblem vs logo that I can find Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/MOS does not even have the term "emblem" or "logo" in it -- Tawker (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Tawker cannot prove any such violation ever took place, the svg was always shown no greater than 140 px, he's trying to cover for his policy mininterpretation and for failing to discuss the matter before his improper speedy deletion.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
There was no problem with the size, just the lack of use. awker deleted it because it sat unused for the required length of time. If it is used and is fair use we can have it. I restored this before and it stayed up for a few months. It is best to discuss which image to use on the talk page of the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Rakshit Kumar

We have a reliable source. Just tell us how to add it now -Baibadmintonindia (talk) 08:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

  • For this we need 2 reliable sources and a claim of importance. Is this person a professional? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Order of Thelemic Knights

Some one noted on the deletion page: "blatant hoax" as if the organization didn't exist. As the CEO of this organization, which works along side of The Red Cross and other charities, I take exception to this. Furthermore, there are articles on Wikipedia itself that reference pages written by our members on our website. We also do a fair bit of publishing, which can be verified with a quick search on Amazon.com - quite frankly, I am disappointed that an organization that does the sort of work we do would be so easily blown off by your editors with so little research. -98.246.136.146 (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order of Thelemic Knights, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TerriersFan (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Thank you for your direction. I appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solis93 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Logos of BBC divisions, mostly radio

These above logos are still copyrighted in the UK, but they are ineligible for copyright protection in US. See File:BBC.svg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). --George Ho (talk) 00:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

  Done in line with the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_January_30, no reason not to undelete, and likely candidates for deletion on commons. Attaching {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Map of the Past

It is the page of an upcoming album by a moderately famous music group. There are pages for 4 of their other albums so it makes little sense to delete the page for Map of the Past. If you restore it I will ensure it is referenced properly and up to the Wiki standard. Thanks! -Space Rodeo (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Map of the Past, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). I'd suggest you do so after you improve the draft at User:Space Rodeo/Map of the Past where I rosored what wa sthere. Please note that this album is different than the others as there aren't any reviews yet. So take your time and don't move it to artcile space without contacting Ron. If then your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

The Big Property List

would like to amend to amke the page appropriate for wikipedia. I have seen other company pages such as Teplio.com , could you help with suggestions to make the page acceptable? -Jamesgcole (talk) 14:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Jamesgcole/The Big Property List. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Y (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Persone

-Naŋar (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm requesting userfication these two articles so I can work on improving them. I'm bundling the two requests because these are closely related articles deleted at the same time. I think both of these groups are important enough within their subculture to warrant better articles. -Naŋar (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Naŋar/Persone. And User:Naŋar/Dolchamar. Please check back with TexasAndroid before moving it back. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Naŋar (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Morneau

Roger Morneau was a famous Seventh-day Adventist author with a unique contribution to Adventism (as the only Seventh-day Adventist of note to corroborate Adventism's 'Great Controversy' theme based on personal experience with Luciferianism ) and thus should belong in the series of articles on Seventh-day Adventism. The first Google search term for Roger Morneau is 'wikipedia' yet there is no wikipedia article for him. I'd be willing to add extra material to the article to be sure it meets the notability requirement -Day7s (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Gift_of_the_Givers

Page was restored by User:Fastily after improper speedy deletion, but talk page wasn't. Fastily is on a wikibreak, and his talk page told me to come here. -Slashme (talk) 09:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done Just a banner, though. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Ah, OK, I didn't know what it might have contained, so I didn't want to edit it without first restoring the history. Thanks for the restore! --Slashme (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Alaska (band)

Alaska (band) was first to play the Nearfest International Progressive Rock Festival, linked here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEARfest -72.9.30.187 (talk) 19:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

see http://www.alaskasongs.com/ -72.9.30.187 (talk) 19:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

  •   Not done - The band described in the deleted page is not the same one as your link. If you create an account, you can create an article about the band you linked to. However, I suggest you take a look at notability guidelines and musician notability guidelines first, as the band you linked too may not be notable enough for inclusion either.--ThaddeusB (talk) 20:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Multiblitz

will edit and improve -Multiblitz (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The article was deleted b/c of G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion back in April, 2011. I edited and it was fine until it was deleted for the same reason in December, 2011. I understand that you guys don't compare to other pages, but there are other pages with basically the same content about another company (e.g. Profoto). Please advise what is necessary so this doesn't happen again.

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Wulmserine/Multiblitz. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Fastily (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. For further guidance check out the links at top of the page. The best way to learn is to edit something different. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The Mole (MC/producer)

I would like to provide references for the article, the absence of which, was the main reason that it was deleted. -69.230.109.25 (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done Given that the article has been deleted per consensus discussion, I'd usually refer you to the deleting admin, Tparis, but I gather from your contributions that you've already done so, though it isn't clear to me when and under which account. I've therefore restored it to the incubator at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The Mole (MC/producer) where you and other people can improve it. Once improved, please also contact Tparis again. If things cannot be settled, the place to eventually sort things out is deletion review. In any case, please review Wikipedia's autobiography, conflict of interest, and notability guidelines. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Directed panspermia

I created a Directed Panspermia page. It was deleted because there is already a short section on this subject on the Panspermia page. However, the proposed article is subtantially more detailed and in-depth and I believe that it justifies to remain a separate page. The proposed article summarizes technical research published in peer reviwed papers over 35 years, with over 20 references to this literature. The subject of seeding space with life is of public interest and has notable as shown by media coverage including the New Scientist, Red Ice Radio, and PhysOrg, sienceandreligiontoday,and many other webpages and web journals. For these reasons it should justify a separate page in wikipeadia. The present related short section under Panspermia can be linked to the new proposed main article as is common in Wikpedia pages. - AbrahamDavidson (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

TETROSYL GROUP LTD

Please explain why certain groups/companies are listed on Wikipedia, such as Persil and Coca Cola and not Tetrosyl. What criteria do the company have to meet to be listed on Wikipedia? -SARAHELIZTAYLOR (talk) 09:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

  • An article could exist on this company if others have written about it. This version was very promotional and that was the reason it was deleted. Also there was no references to show that others had written about it. The article on Persil was not written by marketing people from that company. And other stuff exists does not justify this article when compared to something very different. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Chahat Khanna

My another account created the page (Chahat Khanna) which has been deleted actually there wasn't any kind of problem that was a short article.. that must not be deleted even i was not informed for the problem that directly get deleted so please undelete this page -QMobile13 (talk) 13:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

The only accounts I see having created subject article are sockpuppets of a banned user. Does this mean you're one too? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
No,
  Not done and will not be done Sock blocked. Skier Dude (talk) 17:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Maurice "Moe" Carpenter - The Inkredibles

requested deletion accidentally -Luckyleftyllc (talk) 14:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done GB fan 18:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Mark Osei Kwasi Boamah Brown

Hi Admin! Hope you are all well. This article was proposed for deletion as someone thought the person had not played profesional football and therefore wasn't a notable person. however; the person in question 'Mark Osei Kwasi Boamah Brown' has played professional football with the Spanish Football Association in the Tercera Division as confirmed by the following references: http://www.futbolesta.com/p_equipo_SQL.asp?equipo=478 http://www.futbolesta.com/P_Ranking1_SQL.asp?idusu=&id=49305 http://www.albadeporte.com/?p=2414 http://www.eldigitaldeportivo.es/articulos.asp?idarticulo=25095 http://www.ffcm.es/pnfg/NFG_CmpPartido?cod_primaria=1000120&CodActa=96525

I will update the article with further references as soon as it is restored.Regards. -Supreme-2012 (talk) 15:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 18:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Larson Financial

originally deleted for not unnotoriety. This company is an award winning organization, recognized by public media, in Westminster, CO and I see no reason for deletion. Please advise to improvements that can be made -Larsonmedia (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 18:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers/Infoboxes RfC

this deletion is not a "G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup" -Bulwersator (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done What might be confusing here is the fact that the project page is just a redirect to its own talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Jessica Sporty

I was away for a couple weeks and my article was gone when I came back. -CallawayRox (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 18:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Kyle Johnson Accountability Coach

reasoning -IamKitten (talk) 23:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

My page keeps getting flagged and I have not done anything wrong. everything I wrote is true and I am not getting any messages explaining what exactly what was wrong with my posting about Kyle Johnson the discipline accountability coach. everything I wrote was honest, true, and completely true, Kyle himself can verify it himself if needed

File:Organizacja Harcerska Związku Młodzieży Polskiej 1950-1956.png

this one _is_ my image, no idea why it was deleted, want a chance to undo the damage. It was good when I uploaded it. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Is the badge that you imaged your design as well? The labelling on the image looked OK, but we need to know about the original object. This looks to be a creative work. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
No, it was created 20 years before I was born, and defunct 16 years prior. As I say, the licensing was good when I uploaded it, may I see the history to see what happened in the interim? I never claimed it was my design.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Ah, I get what you are asking now. What I meant was, usually I ask to fix images uploaded by others. This time I am asking regarding one of my own.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
The corresponding tag on Commons says to deleting admins "Always check the history in case of vandalistic actions to this page which could have hidden a valid source or otherwise misrepresent the information on this page." That's what I want to check for.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Anyone?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Here is what the text said:

{{di-no fair use rationale|date=17 December 2011}} {{NotMovedToCommons|File:Organizacja Harcerska Związku Młodzieży Polskiej 1950-1956.png|reason=item should not be on the commons as it is a copyright image here with a fiar-use rationale.}} {{Information |Description={{pl|[[:pl:Czuwajka|Czuwajka]] - odznaka Organizacji Harcerskiej Związku Młodzieży Polskiej okresu stalinowskiego}} |Source=Transferred from [http://pl.wikipedia.org pl.wikipedia]; |Author=Original uploader was [[:pl:User:Augiasz|Augiasz]] at [http://pl.wikipedia.org pl.wikipedia] |Permission=CC-BY-SA-2.5. |other_versions= }}

Licensing:

{{self|author=[[:pl:User:Augiasz|Augiasz]] at [http://pl.wikipedia.org pl.wikipedia]|Cc-by-sa-2.5}} {{svg}} == Licensing == {{Non-free Scout logo}} [[Category:Scout and Guide national emblems]]

the problem is that we do not know if the original badge is in copyright or not, If it is, which is likely, then the image could be used under fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Paranormal Psychology

reasoning -64.167.69.90 (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The delection is based on copyright laws, I am the owner and creator of this information. Tres Mali Scott. The information is also published on academic style sites. http://paranormalpsychology.wordpress.com (The International Library of Paranormal Psychology) http://tmscconsultingservices.wordpress.com (TMSC Consulting Services, LLC Psychic Division) 64.167.69.90 (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done You have been abusing multiple accounts to create inappropriate userpages (something like one for each keyword) to promote your ideas and blogs. So it still qualifies for speedy deletion as spam and there are more to look at at than the three mentioned here. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Krishna G Naik

reasoning -Naik1234 (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna G. Naik, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Para-terrorism

reasoning -64.167.69.90 (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Para-terrorism is an academic theory about advanced terrorism and it's use of technology. This page is not advertising or promoted anything. It is a systemic look at how terrorist have used technology. 64.167.69.90 (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done You have been abusing multiple accounts to create inappropriate userpages (something like one for each keyword) to promote your ideas and blogs. So it still qualifies for speedy deletion as spam and there are more to look at at than the three mentioned here. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

User:The Scott Internet Writing Style

reasoning -64.167.69.90 (talk) 19:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The Scott Internet Writing Style Manual is an academic style writing for bloggers and companies to use when someone is not familar with major writing style documentation, for example (APA, MLA, or The Chicago Writing Style). It is also used to publish academic articles, crisis reported articles, and summaries of major research on the internet. The Writings of African-Americans (Best Blogs by Blogged 2010 in Crisis Reporting by Tres Mali Scott uses this writing style), TMSC International® Management & Leadership also uses this writing style (Google Images Top Clicks August 2011), and The International Library of Paranormal Psychology.64.167.69.90 (talk) 19:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done You have been abusing multiple accounts to create inappropriate userpages (something like one for each keyword) to promote your ideas and blogs. I also note that this account has been blocked and there are more to look at at than the three mentioned here. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

anthony_myint

reasoning for deletion was that anthony myint was not notable, which is highly questionable given that he was named by numerous publications as very influential in the food world, and is a co-founder of mission chinese food, which has been named #2 in the usa by bon appetit magazine as well as gq which named mr. myint's restaurant #4 new restaurant in the usa. in addition, he was named eater.com's empire builder of the year, and was one of chow.com's top 13 most influential people in the food world. I believe he might not have been considered notable because of the old media type thinking where food celebrities are not considered real celebrities, but I believe that wikipedia should be able to realize in this day an age, with cooking channel, food network youtube, dozens of food publications, new types of cookbooks (including one that mr myint authored) that creative food people should be recognized. -160.83.73.15 (talk) 19:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Pirate Party of Greece

in my best knowledge, pirate party of greece now has sufficient third party references. if restored, i will add them asap. -Pappasadrian (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Hi878/motdtools.js

This was a useful script that has been deleted for no apparent reason; if the user does not want it restored can you email me (with the email user function) with the text so I can put it on my own subpage? Thank you. -Rcsprinter (rap) 20:06, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  •   Done User:Hi878 requested deletion them self, so there was a reason. However I have emailed a copy. Use at your own risk. I will not restore to Hi878 userspace due to delete request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Forward National Literature Award

Forward National Literature (FNL) is an independent literary organization dedicated to honoring traditionally published works in twelve categories. As well as garnering attention to its recipients and likely increasing sales, FNL showcases a combination of previously undiscovered and well-known authors based on content, uniqueness, and readability. http://forwardliteratureaward.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.192.9.34 (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 And no wonder; you sound like a marketeer! —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

  •   Not done due to the promotional text. However that does not prevent it being rewritten in an encyclopedic style. Remember reliable independent sources are needed to show notability. If the author cannot avoid terms like garner, honoring and increasing sales, it is best to leave this to someone else to write. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The Inherited Repression

reasoning -212.137.36.236 (talk) 13:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

This album clearly now exists and is available on iTunes.

  Not done and will not be done This was about a newly released album, but contained no evidence of notability. The article had no reliable, independent, published sources, and no credible assertion of notability. Mere existence does not qualify a recording for an article in Wikipedia; and lots of obscure crap is "available on iTunes." --Orange Mike | Talk 14:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:List_of_roads_in_Toronto/northsouthTOC

This template was deleted on the basis that {{Horizontal TOC}} would replicate it. However, it does not do this, as Horizontal TOC also numbers each entry. This makes the TOC far more confusing and less usable than it was with a hard-coded template. -ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 18:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

As above -ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 18:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done If you now have further thoughts about the deletion discussion where you participated, you should contact the deleting admin Plastikspork or maybe first the user who mentions some css sheets. In any case this board here isn't the right place since it is only for the restoration of uncontroversial stuff. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:46, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Kenn Gardner wikipedia page

This website was created to acknowledge the accomplishments of Kenn Gardner while in public office as a Wake County Commissioner and outside accomplishments such as being the founder of the foster care scholarship program: the "W.I.S.E Initiative". Kenn Gardner is also a candidate in the 2012 elections for North Carolina Secretary of State and as such, citizens may wonder about his background and accomplishments. Therefore, I have created this webpage and believe that it should be included in the encyclopedia. I do not believe that it is appropriate to allow some candidates a wiki page, while others are unable to have one and that is another reason why I sought to create this page.

Other complaints that I have received from Wikipedia involve personal bias. I do not believe that I am being bias but merely stating his accomplishments. I have re-edited it since it has been deleted and I would hope that it is now completely free from bias. If you believe it to still be bias, I would hope that you could simply send a message with specific parts that are "bias" and allow me to re-word. I believe this page is very important and should be added to the encyclopedia. I have showed others and they believe it to be a good addition as well, not just because he is a candidate but also because he has made large contributions to Wake County. -Angardn2 (talk) 18:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done You had already recreated the article so there was no need for a refund. Now the second one has been deleted as well, but at this point you’d need to ask first for an unblock and then discuss undeletion with the deleting administrator Todds1. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zvi_Brenner

Subject was a significant zionist leader. As referenced (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orde_Wingate), a compatriot of Orde Wingate: "In May 1939, he was transferred back to Britain. Wingate became a hero of the Yishuv (the Jewish Community), and was loved by leaders such as Zvi Brenner and Moshe Dayan who had trained under him, and who claimed that Wingate had "taught us everything we know." -68.228.14.84 (talk) 02:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

A simple Google search of: "zvi brenner" wingate will return many relevant references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.14.84 (talk) 02:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Brenner was also the founder and leader until his death of Kibbutz Afikim (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afikim) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.14.84 (talk) 02:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please make sure to add some of the sources, Wikipedia itself apart. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File talk:BBC.svg

There must be available revisions. -George Ho (talk) 09:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done Two available revisons rstored. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

CSM Stanley Russell Marlette

The late CSM Marlette is a military historical figure. He was on the first list of Command Sergeants Major selected in the entire US Army. He was in the top three-five finalists for selection as the first Sergeant Major of the Army. He was the Command Sergeant Major of the 3rd Infantry Division, and other divisions. Much more can be established regarding his permanent notability.-Writer21.1 (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

This has actually been deleted after your post. You may want to contact User:DGG who deleted it. If you need the text back to write an improved version, let us know. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Jane Campbell (All My Children)

Are there any non-infringing revisions that do not plagiarize or infringe Soapcentral or "Pine Valley Bulletin"? -George Ho (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Probably at least the inital stub. Why are you asking? It wasn't deleted for copyright reasons, but as a redirect without target. If you need it to redirect somewhere else, just do so. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Kevin Cawley & Darren Smith

Played numerous games for Ayr United in the Scottish First Division -Salty1984 (talk) 20:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.

Played numerous games in the First Division with Raith Rovers -Salty1984 (talk) 20:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Chris Chu

I have some sources -Zushanmo (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done Then consider to create a new article explaining who Chris Chu was and which awards he won, adding those sources preferably developing a draft at User:Zushanmo/Chris Chu. No point in restoring the previous single sentence --Tikiwont (talk) 21:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Mistresses of the Swedish royal family

The article was deleted without a discussion as a result of the unrelated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Names of Kings of Sweden. Of the users who expressed an opinion on the mistresses article one voted for deletion while three voted keep.

The rational expressed by the nominator for delete was "mistresses are usually not encyclopedic". Since the deletion we have seen the creation of articles the English royal mistress, List of English royal mistresses, List of Scottish royal mistresses plus a number of new subcategories in Category:Royal mistresses. The Category:Mistresses of Swedish royalty now contains 28 articles. We also have List of French royal mistresses. Individual articles have large sections on mistresses, like Mistresses of Henry VIII. -Petri Krohn (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

I've informed the deleting admin of this request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
On reviewing the AfD, I agree tha there is no clear consensus for deleting this article. I'm restoring it without prejudice to a new AfD discussion.  Sandstein  06:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Yishan Wong

Reddit CEO -61.51.141.244 (talk) 06:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. There still might be a deletions discussion, so please add more references. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

EASAC

I'm a responsible of EASAC that's why I used text from the original website -Hansenlaurent (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done - this page is a copyright violation. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

How do you want me to prove it that I'm a responsable of EASAC?

Thinkup

I wish to continue work on this pre-stub article deleted due to 'A1' on an open source project. I have researched some references and a basic description and have made contact with the project's lead. These should provide sufficient context. I'd like to work in the incubator with the possibility of visibility and collaboration with others and an impartial assessment.

A simple Google search of: "thinkup" will return many relevant references.

-OrenBochman (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

  •   Not done You have been clearly and plainly advised how to proceed with re-creating an article such as this - preferably as a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. Indeed, the deleting admin has been excessively helpful in guiding you. Please take their advice, and beware of original research - contacting a project lead? Ouch (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
  • I've contacted the project lead to clear copyright issues under fair use - should I have contacted someone else about this?
  • Since I feel that my request has not been given serious consideration, I will now make a public statement for the benefit of others.
  • I took a month to review policy before making the initial request, I've checked how best I could get my work restored so I could continue to work in peace. I consulted deletion policy, read this page's as well as the incubator's before finding any real avenue for setting things right.
  • This was obviously a waste of time since these rules have by and large only been consulted arbitrary and only after poor decisions have been made.
  • I've requested technical assistance which the deleter contritely refused from the outset.
  • He advised me to ask else where - so I came here. I guess this part of his suggestion you thought I should ignore.
  • I understand clearly why Peridon was so arrogant - one administrator's hand washes another and the consequences be damned.
  • I can also read between the lines - at every turn veiled threats why the article will be deleted once I place it into the main space. This from the outset is the reason I requested the incubator.
  • I am patently disgusted with how you little courtesy you treat other editors or their work and the general lack of decency going round these days - would it it relay hurt, you to do the right thing ??

OrenBochman (talk) 21:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually, A1s can't be challenged here, as they require a fundamental rewrite to be an encyclopedia article. What admins can do, however, is send you a copy of the deleted revisions so that you can improve on it before submitting it as a userspace draft. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

It seems that the article should not have been deleted under an A1 clause since it provided sufficient context. So this is just a technicality OrenBochman (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

SADDOLLS

I Think that the reasons that saddolls page was deleted were incoorect! This band has a full discography and the profile was complete and the links were reliable.Please reconsider and undelete -Fantazma1234 (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SADDOLLS, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Salix alba (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Multimedia University

the whole article was deleted only because of minor dispute -S12796 (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

This one's odd. I don't see a copyvio here, at least not at the URL in the deletion tag and this article has a history going all the way back to 2002 so even if it was, there should be a non-infringing version to revert to. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
  Done Sent it to copyright problems, which should catch any issues. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Valentine

Am doing research on Radio Free America after reading about it in a book (The Patriots by James Wesley Rawles, Ulysses Press). Would like to see what was written about the show's host, Tom Valentine. -71.63.150.65 (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Question: Were you interested in trying to improve & salvage the article or just read it? If you just want to read you can find it here. If you want to work on the article, let me know and I'll put it in the Article Incubator for you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Andrew Weinreich

My name is Courtney Boyd Meyers and I'm the feature editor for The Next Web (http://thenextweb.com/author/courtneybmyers/). I've written two articles on Andrew Weinreich (http://thenextweb.com/entrepreneur/2011/07/30/where-are-they-now-new-york-citys-dot-com-entrepreneurs-part-one/5/ and http://www.huffingtonpost.com/courtney-boyd-myers/meetmoi-wants-to-pay-for-_b_768820.html ). I've been in touch with InsideSiliconAlley and validated all the links and historical accuracy of this article as well as would like to add two new links of articles that came out in the past month referencing Weinreich as the founder of social networking (http://technology.plidd.com/facebooks-ipo-marks-the-end-of-the-web-2-0-era-the-social-web-is-the-new-king/ http://www.usatoday.com/video/facebook-vs-google/1427765045001 ). Because of the historical significance of social networking particularly in light of the impending Facebook IPO, I would like to assume authorship of this piece and see it undeleted. This is with the permission of InsideSiliconAlley.

CBMWiki (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)CBMWiki

I'd suggest you start a new article; the previous one was full of promotional bumfodder and "citations" to blogs and forums. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Orange Mike: Thanks for the quick feedback. I'm happy to pursue the route you suggest. If I write an article, would you mind editing it? Do we need to coordinate with BWilkins? 108.60.141.179 (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)CBMWiki

Wilkins will undoubtedly be casting the same skeptical eye on it as I. What is your business relationship, if any, with the subject? And why on Earth should we give a darn whether InsideSiliconAlley (whoever or whatever that is) approves of what appears here or not? --Orange Mike | Talk 22:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Relationship with subject as I explained before was that I covered this subject as a reporter. With respect to your second questions I have tried to be deferential to the rules herein, and didn't want to claim authorship of a piece for which I was not entirely the author.

108.60.141.179 (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)CBMWiki

Emilia Tan

reasoning -myBatik 07:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

references 1)unknown. (2011). Emilia Tan. Available: http://www.tmsart.com.my/tmsartgallery/feature-artists/emilia-tan/. Last accessed 10th March 2012. 2)unknown. (2009). Emilia Tan. Available: http://www.lovemilia.com.my/2011/12/batik-exhibition-at-international-school-of-kuala-lumpur-iskl/emilia-tan-2/. Last accessed 10th March 2012.

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
  Not done Neither of the three differently spelled versions on your page is refundable and the links you give above are again written by the subject. User name is also inappropriate. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:You'reWelcome.jpg

Image was deleted by a bot after it was removed from its article by Δ for not having fair-use rationale. Simple task to add rationale and re-use it. -— Ian Moody (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done Skier Dude (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

jwcurry

reasoning -99.245.248.209 (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


jwcurry is one of Canada's most unusual and important poets and the bibliographer of bpNichol. His work and study is unique within Canada. While the original article may lack citations, there are abundant sources for curry and his work online.

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jwcurry, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Xavexgoem (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 00:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Whenaxis/twinkleoptions.js

User request within own userspace. Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 01:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done Skier Dude (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Carlos "Caique" Elias

This page was nominated for speedy deletion because my original username "cjjusa1" led a reviewer to reasonably believe that I had a COI (conflict of interest) and that the article was likely for for promotional purposes only. While I acknowledge the appearance of COI, I have stated openly that I was a student of Caique's (I've trained under lots of different people), but am not otherwise affiliated with him. I successfully completed a change of username and now I would like to request that the original page be reinstated.

The reasons I believe the page should be reinstated are:

  1. The subject of the article, Carlos "Caique" Elias, clearly meets the WP:IMPORTANCE guidelines. Caique is a notable "elder" in the world of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, being one of only 20 people in the world to achieve a rank of black and red belt. He is one of only 4 black and red belts in the entire United States. He trained directly under Helio Gracie, one of the founding fathers of BJJ.
  2. Caique is already listed as a notable practitioner on the following Wikipedia pages: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu ranking system, Kevin Burns (fighter), Hélio Gracie, and Gracie Humaitá. In particular, on the Gracie Humaitá page, please pay attention to how many of the other notable students of this academy have their own Wikipedia pages (and many of these subjects have lower rank than Caique).
  3. The article is written in what I believe to be a NPOV manner. It is not promotional nor does it make any unsubstantiated claims. In fact, it is arguably more NPOV than articles about other BJJ practitioners.
  4. The article contains at least two external, independent references backing up the contents of the article.

In summary, I think the article is more than good enough to be included in Wikipedia and I would be happy to work wit the community on improving it further once it is un-deleted. -Thechadl (talk) 01:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - I am undeleting the article and putting in to incubation to give you and anyone else interested a chance to improve it. It can now be found here. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

2004–05 Las Vegas Wranglers season

to restore stub-article deleted as an expired prod -Dolovis (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement

I wish to contest this expired prod. I restored it myself, but User:Shii decided to wikilawyer and redelete it, saying I had to request it here. Please restore the talk page at the same time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The redirects haven't been deleted with the original prod but with the re-delte, so I've left them out for now. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

2005–06 Las Vegas Wranglers season

to restore stub-article deleted as an expired prod -Dolovis (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Toshio Yamaguchi/Community poll regarding the NFCC situation

I want to work on that draft again. --- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 07:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done --Tikiwont (talk) 10:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Fumi Kumatani

reasoning -Dred05m (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

hello, propose for undelete the article of Fumi Kumatani. by adding the proper references.

You need to provide the references before an undeletion request will be considered, as it was stickyprodded and will not be restored without references. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Nader Shakhshir

It is about a very public figure in Jordan and he is joining a lot of global competitions and classes -NaderShakhshir (talk) 05:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  Blocked --Tikiwont (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

image provided by author

reasoning -Fawad gohar (talk) 09:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC) Image provided by the author

Above is no image. As far as I see, you have upoalded two different ones under File:Syed Abdul Rahim Shah Bukhari.jpg which hasn't been deleted yet. I've reset the timer so that you can add the missing info. Please check out the links on your talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND)

Was speedy deleted by DGG per WP:CSD § R3 while doesn't qualify. Furthermore, such redirects are routinely kept in WP:RFD discussions for the sake of history preservation. Thus it should be restored with its history. -Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done by Rossami. But keep in mind that this board here is only for uncontroversial stuff. It is more appropriate and also more effective to discuss particular R3 deletions with the deleting administrator. Also with those who tag. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Organizacja Harcerska Związku Młodzieży Polskiej 1950-1956.png

asking again as first request was not fulfilled-if there is a problem, I will fix it as I have always done with these requests -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

  Done Please note that I've updated the no-rationale deletion, so you have a week to go. Nyttend (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Atmonauti

Atmonauti is a real skydiving discipline that is becoming more widely practiced around the world today. -192.249.47.179 (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Deleted following AFD and therefore not eligible for undeletion via this process. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  Not done per above Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_64&oldid=1142568389"