Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 132

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 125 ← Archive 130 Archive 131 Archive 132 Archive 133 Archive 134 Archive 135

File:British pre-decimal threepence coin reverse 1937.png

This was deleted as an unused non-free image, but as a work of the UK government dated 1937, I think {{PD-UKGov}} applies. -John of Reading (talk) 19:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

I agree.   Done, restored. Consider moving this image to Commons. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
@Amatulic: I've just been discussing this at the uploader's talk page. Apparently we have to treat coins as 3D objects, so the photographer has to give away his rights in the image. This one will have to be deleted again, I'm afraid. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
This is correct, the coin is PD-UKGov, but the photograph can have its own copyright due to the potential for artistic nature, including lighting, shot framing, etc. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Breaking Point

I, Fficombat, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fficombat (talk) 21:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katsuhiro Kawamitsu

I, 49.98.76.55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 49.98.76.55 (talk) 00:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, the tone of the article is far too casual for Wikipedia. You'll need to do some pretty substantial re-writes to make it fit WP:NPOV, among other issues. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

The Wrong Way Back

This page is about a charity cycle ride that takes place every 2 years and raises money for Help for Heroe's, Macmillan Cancer Support. Please can it be undeleted as I only just started adding content to it! "Save page" button below -Neilspinney (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Honestly, the way it is written, the topic looks like something made up. It's a very short article. Instead of writing draft articles in main article space, please start a new draft in your sandbox if you're serious about it, or use WP:AFC to submit it. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sollentuna Volleybollklubb

I, 193.15.240.60, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 193.15.240.60 (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done. It's restored, but if it isn't a pro club, it's unlikely to be accepted into main article space. Good luck. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

The great sufi saint Hazrat syed sakhi Zain ul Abideensultan sarwar

Request for the removal of G11 or speedy deletion, Dearest sir, I am and my family is getting much too knowledge and informations from the tireless efforts of wikipdias team,surely your site is a ocean of knowledge.Every aspect of life is manifested in a grandeur way.I have done a small effort to promote the wikipedias efforts,ever done for the mankind on this planet,which results in the attainment of the love of God.My article is purely based on the history of sufi saint of 11th century.The aim is to provide a comprehensive detail to the history lovers.Peoples of the pakistan and the rest of the world,have a great respect,passion and love with the saints of the world.Hence i wish to place a request in deference to you to allow my article on Wikipdia.Its not a effort to promote a company or advertising something.The histoy of the saint syed zain ul Abideen, not present on any site or in the books taught in schools or colleges.The history related intellectuals,professors and students are always happy to find new updates,something new for their students and institutions.Thatis my goal.In future i wish to submit more and more article about the saints,their seal stamps and their belongings.

Regretting inconvenience and thanking your grace, Mohammad Azmat3687Azam (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. The article was written in a promotional tone. Wikipedia is not the place to editorialize, promote a religious point of view, memorialize, or aggrandize, and the deleted article was full of all of that. Try again at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Garcia - Musician

I, Chrismunguia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chrismunguia (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

I do not remember!

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ladybelle Fiske (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Too complicated for me.

@Ladybelle Fiske: I see your sandbox was deleted, it had an article about "FREEDOM AND UNITY: The Vermont Movie". Is that what you're looking for? §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Ebru_TV

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -192.199.225.11 (talk) 05:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC) While television station articles, like all articles on Wikipedia, should ideally meet the general notability guidelines, in general, any television station which produces original content and is licensed by a national government (e.g., the FCC in the United States) is presumed to be notable.

In addition, the station in question has grown in profile, is mentioned in other articles (FTA, Free-to-air), and has changed in character since the deletion.

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebru TV, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. you could write a draft that includes independent references asd we can consider if it is ready for mainspace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Graeme Bartlett. I'm no longer an admin, but I've got no objections to this page being worked on in someone's userspace, or, if the community feels it's appropriate, recreation or undeletion. I'll defer to community consensus and standards. — Cirt (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TW_Business_Development_LLP

Hi there, Im Xavier here and im the co-founder of TW Business Development, based in Singapore. My company registration is T14LL0501C. This is a legit company site. May i know why do you delete my page and its contents after hours of trying to figure out how to submit my company to wikipedia? We are trying to establish an online presence and help is much appreciated. Please reply to me via : (Redacted) -Xavierjwong (talk) 16:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We are not a business listing website, and attempting to use us as one will just get the page deleted as fast as you keep creating it, eventually leading to a title lock to stop you from doing it. Please see WP:Conflict of interest as well. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/பாவ்சார் க்ஷத்திரியர்

I, 116.203.148.46, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 116.203.148.46 (talk) 15:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

We don't accept non-English articles. You're best off writing this on the Tamil Wikipedia instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. Please do not request undeletion of an article draft unless you actually intend to work on it. WP:Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  Not done, for two reasons:
  • The request was made once before, and the article was restored, last November. Not one single edit was made to it, so six months later, it was deleted again. Wikipedia has no interest in providing indefinite free hosting space for draft articles.
  • This is the English Wikipedia. And yet, this article is not in English, and none of the dozens of edits to the article were in English. There is no benefit to the English Wikipedia in maintaining a non-English page.
On that basis, this request for restoration is   Declined. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Isoland federation

I accidentally used my name i am sorry will edit -Rkb13 (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Looks like a blatant hoax. JMHamo (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done and will not be done I'm sorry, but this looks to be a clear hoax. We do not allow or tolerate hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you can find hard evidence to prove that this federation exists then we may re-create the article, but offhand I couldn't find anything to substantiate that this is anything other than something a few people came up with one day. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Anastasia S. Fontaines

I have articles in well known magazines , radio shows, and interviews to add for Ms. Fontaines . I will need to time to find all information required. The process may be slow for me. I want to get through it successfully and triumph that I have learned to edit on here. " button below -Venus2211 (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello there @Anon126: informed me that this was where I can ask to find the page I started on Ms. Fontaines in order to work on it. I am new to all of this. I had not provided enough information for Wikipedia. It will help me a great deal to be able to build the page at my own pace. I find getting around wikipedia challenging and am a true novice. Please grant me the time and patience to work on Ms. Fontaines page. Thanks, Thanks, Thanks. Venus2211 (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Venus2211

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. If you're employed by Miss Fontaines in any fashion, you may wish to read WP:Conflict of interest before continuing, and you may want to start from scratch via an AfC draft. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Do you want this as a draft article @Venus2211:? You can have it in your own sandbox to give you time to get it up to standard. I don't agree that it was promotional, but there was as yet no claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
NOte from deleting admin - I did not delete it as promotional, but because notability was not asserted. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Thanks (talk) . No. I am a fan. I would be of no use to Ms. Fontaines getting payed to do this. This is mind challenging for me and something I'm doing on my own time. Thanks for making it possible to do work on here The assistance is phenomenal. I have other independent celebrities and artists I will edit when I get better at it. Especially ones that do so much service work outside of their crafts. Many don't get the credit they deserve or have the resources/time. Even if they've done notable works. I want to give back to those. The page is editable now? Thanks if you have made that possible. Can I refer you to a few of the magazine and radio articles to start? Articles INSTYLE MAGAZINE and more Various Articles Still. This will take me some time. Thanks thanks Venus2211 (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Venus2211

  Note: I've recommended that this article be restored as a userspace draft to be submitted through AfC. I've explained (I hope) the process, and I think Venus2211 would be fine with it. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 02:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

{reply to -Venus2211 (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Eek! Help. I went back to the edit page for Anastasia S. Fontaines that was up again and an editor re-deleted it before I had a chance to edit and add the references and citations. Then I worked on it on Sandbox I believe and it wouldn't come out right. I tried to send a message to you.Have no idea if I am doing anything correctly. Do pages normally get deleted faster than a person can work on them when they are new at this? I just need to figure it out and have a little time to sort out how to post the references required so that they're visible. They didn't show up when I posted. This is what I posted. Though I added a whole slew of references they didn't show. Below. Anastasia S. Fontaines is a Canadian born Actress, Singer, Songwriter, Pet Rescue advocate and humanitarian of Greek descent. Ms. Fontaines is a diverse performer who has works in Independent film, Commercials, [[Music video] and behind the camera . She has worked the spectrum of the entertainment industry having produced, directed, casting film, song writing and singing. In her private time she is involved in animal rescue, support of abuse victims, the environment and more.


Thanks thanks thanks for all help provided. What a mess! Venus2211 (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Venus2211

  • I've moved these from being a ref to being a bulleted list, as we don't really do the whole "reflist" thing on here. The reason for that is because the references would show for the entire page as opposed to one section, which would be confusing and a little messy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaiden Emerson Benz

I, 98.255.240.94, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.255.240.94 (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Check out WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:ARTIST. JohnCD (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Brandon_Cyrus

Hello, my team and I spent over 6 hours creating this page which came out beautifully after all the hard work we put in it and then we had someone tear it down and 'bully us' and posted threats to block us for undoing their actions. We then had another user stand up for the page describing that it meets 'criteria' under celebrities but needed more sources and both the admin and the author agreed on that. After all this, there was another user who set up "articles for deletion" message on my profile, I deleted that, and I told him "us both already talked about it, we agreed the page should be there, please take this page down" and the user goes "done" as in he agreed. But then the user got out of control, yelling at me, harassing me, posting threats, and I believe that the user was posting messages on several users pages and telling them to mark our page for deletion. In all simply, our page fits the guidelines. The matter of the fact is that BRANDON CYRUS is a celebrity and his IMDb can be found here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6060051/. He works hard in movies such as High School Musical 2, Divergent, Ted 2, and Magic Mike 2, for him to be unnoticed and to not have a Wikipedia is embarrassing and absurd. He definitely meets criteria for celebrities and famous people and should be reinstated immediately. The page was claimed to be an issue due to "not so many sources", however on our way tonight to fix it we noticed it was deleted, which is a shame because we got the sources and our page was bringing in hundreds, hundreds, of visits from people who could be joining Wikipedia right now and donating to it's projects. Please fix this.

Also, I had my username changed and for some reason it doesn't seem to be updating, however I work directly under his management. --BrandonCyrus (talk) 09:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

LOG OFF AND RE-LOG IN WITH YOUR NEW USERNAME. Stop editing under your old username and everything will work just fine. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Cyrus, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tokyogirl79 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  • This is not the correct place to ask for it to be undeleted. I've responded on my talk page (since I was the closing admin) as to why I will not re-create it. The only place to contest the deletion at this point would be Wikipedia:Deletion review, although I do have my serious doubts about his notability. Also, please be careful about stating that people are operating in bad faith, as nominating someone for deletion does not automatically mean that someone is doing it as an attack. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Also, I don't specifically see where an admin said that Cyrus passes notability guidelines. I see where User:Solarra argued for inclusion, but the argument was flawed as the roles were minor. A significant role would be something along the lines of Harry Potter, as the unsaid thing about "significant role" is that the actor would still be the focus of many RS because there would be news stories about the performance. RS would still be required. In any case, one admin saying that the person passes notability guidelines doesn't mean that the person actually does, as there's no guarantee that the admin really knows the guidelines for WP:NACTOR. For example, I'm not fully versed in the ins and outs of notability guidelines for athletes so that means that I could say someone passes guidelines when they really don't. Plus I again have to stress that it's very unwise to say that the deletion actions and editing to the article were performed by people who were specifically setting out to attack Cyrus. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Naz Nizami

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.245.65.244 (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Muhsina

I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST FROM YOU TO UNDELETE THIS PAGE BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO EDIT MORE INFORMATION ALONG BY THE RULES AND REGULATION MADE BY THE WIKIPEDIA "Save page" button below -AmirAlMumineen 05:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The problem was that there really wasn't anything to restore. The page's sole content was "Muhsina (محسنئ) means in Arabic The good doer or The one with the highest faith. Used for the feminine gender." It was pretty much a dictionary/translation definition, and we usually don't have those here on Wikipedia unless they have a lot of coverage in reliable sources to where it can be made into a full article. You could probably go through Wiktionary, although you will still need to back this up with some form of a reliable source to show that it's a commonly used term. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lovesick Riddim

I, 86.177.1.76, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.177.1.76 (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dwayne and Dwight Bosman

Pr1775 (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, I would encourage you to go through and remove any promotional language. Phrases like "well known jazz club", "deep jazz roots", and "famed Sir Winston Churchill’s Star Walk" come across as an attempt to create WP:PUFFERY. In other words, you're trying to write the article to make the subjects look as good as possible. It isn't the worst instance of it I've seen, but it is bad enough to where it will likely interfere with any further attempts to get it accepted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Klirou

I, Massou, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Massou (talk) 06:07, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done and will not be done I'm sorry, but it looks like we already have an article for Klirou and people who have declined the page have repeatedly told you that they will not accept a second page for the subject, and that the information you posted was not really enough to warrant merging or replacing the other page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:40, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Seithikurippu Ratnas Pandi-Perumal

The deletion rationale left by the wikipedia editors cited A7 (speedy deletion): Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." It also provide an exception clause: " with the exception of educational institutions". Mr. Pandi-Perumal is an employee of NYU Medical Center. Here is a 2014 scientific article that was published in PLOS One:

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0092214&representation=PDF

There are several citations related to Mr. Pandi-Perumal's work in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=pandi-perumal&go=Go&gettingStartedReturn=true

The original page existed for several years and edited by, perhaps, multiple wikipedia editors. Was the original writing was eventually changed multiple times and ended up to a stage of speedy deletion.

Was there careful evaluation of facts carried out in this page.

Google search results in over 100K pages:

https://www.google.com/#q=pandi-perumal

Personal blog clearly articulate scientific contributions:

http://pandi-perumal.blogspot.com

One of the world's largest publisher Springer has reference page for Pandi-Perumal:

http://www.springerreference.com/docs/biopage/33666.html

Globally, he seem to be the only one who has edited over 20 volumes in sleep medicine, which is the maximum number of books edited by any sleep specialist.

His researchgate percentile score (RG score of 37.44) is higher than 95% of ResearchGate members scientists:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pandi-Perumal_Seithikurippu_Ratnas/reputation?ev=prf_rep_tab

His googlescholar citation page suggests a higher scores:

http://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=MO90ZXkAAAAJ&hl=en

He is also the Specialty Chief editor of Frontiers in Neurology:

http://community.frontiersin.org/people/S_RPandi-Perumal/8967

The following book reviews available online:

Primary Care Sleep Medicine: a practical guide

Serotonin and Sleep: Molecular, Functional, and Clinical Aspects

Sleep Disorders: their impact on public health


Sleep and Psychosomatic Medicine

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=182475

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1775168

Sleep and Quality of Life in Clinical Medicine

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1152774

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMbkrev0804709

Sleep Disorders: their impact on public health

http://www.journalsleep.org/ViewAbstract.aspx?pid=26888

http://www.sleep-journal.com/article/S1389-9457(07)00239-0/fulltext

Rapid Eye Movement Sleep: regulation and function

http://www.journalsleep.org/ViewAbstract.aspx?pid=28518

Narcolepsy: a clinical guide (1st Edition)

http://www.journalsleep.org/ViewAbstract.aspx?pid=27908

Serotonin and Sleep: Molecular, Functional, and Clinical Aspects

http://www.journalsleep.org/ViewAbstract.aspx?pid=27465

Clinical Pharmacology of Sleep

http://www.sleep-journal.com/article/S1389-9457(07)00007-X/fulltext

Sleep and Mental Illness

http://www.sleep-journal.com/article/S1389-9457(11)00051-7/fulltext

Principles and Practice of Geriatric Sleep Medicine

http://www.sleep-journal.com/article/S1389-9457(10)00372-2/fulltext

Author's blog suggests the following:

"Book reviews for the above volumes have appeared in various international journals. This includes, but not limited to, NEJM, JAMA, Sleep, Sleep Medicine, Clinical Neuropsychiatry, Acta Neuropsychiatrica, Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, Psychological Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, European Journal of Neurology, Comprehensive therapy, Respiratory Care, Integrative and Comparative Biology, Mayo Clinical Proceedings, Traffic Injury Prevention, The ICADTS (The newsletter of the International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety) Reporter, and other health-related journals that can be searched online".

However, the blog author did not provide links to these claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justme2014 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

If page contained any unsupported claims, was there any genuine effort taken to improve this page (by deleting any biased claims) or try to look back the earlier versions of the page so that the page meets the standards of inclusion criteria. -Justme2014 (talk) 01:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. "Educational institutions" doesn't include staff of same, and Article X does not justify article Y - he has to be notable on his own. We also do not accept blogs, Google, profiling sites, or similar as references. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I'll also add to this that being usable as a reliable source doesn't always mean that someone is notable. The same thing goes for being referenced in various different scholarly papers. It's kind of a tricky thing, as we have to be able to verify that the cites aren't done by the same institution or someone he's worked with, or so on. If you can find something that can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he's a pioneer in his field, that would be helpful. Mostly it boils down to someone getting an in-depth mention in a paper or book by someone who is not personally tied to person in question. Otherwise, we can't really go by how many articles or books someone has written because the academic world is pretty much a "publish or perish" type of environment. It's expected that someone will put out a lot of journals and books. We need stuff that's secondary and in reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I mean, he could potentially pass notability guidelines, but we need more specific things. Google hits and a scholar index doesn't always mean notability is met, as our guidelines are very strict. In other words, we need stuff like this review for one of the books he worked on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quanta Science Magazine

Quanta Science Magazine is the only student-run science magazine in San Diego. I think that it should have a place on Wikipedia. I know that what I created probably didn't make it seem like a big deal because this was my first article, but it is. I know a number of students who would have liked to have a general-information source to be able to look up, myself included, because it's hard to become a writer for Quanta if you don't know a lot of the magazine's history (you would only know if you went to The Bishop's School, and many do not. This is especially unfair for them, since Quanta's website only releases its publications and a little information about its editors). I think this article should exist so that students from other schools in California who would like to join the Quanta Science Magazine writing team can, by being able to access some of Quanta's background information and past publications, have a more equal chance to do so. -Imtheangel7283 (talk) 21:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  • Offhand, I can't really find anything to show that this magazine has been the focus of coverage in places that are both reliable and independent of the magazine itself. The thing about being the first or only of something, is that this doesn't automatically extend coverage. It may make it more likely that something will gain coverage, but it's not a guarantee. A magazine can be the first of its type in the entire world (as opposed to one city in the USA), but that still doesn't guarantee coverage- which is what we need to establish notability. As far as it being WP:USEFUL, we don't keep things based on whether or not it'd be useful. You have to establish notability via WP:RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Web Coverage Processing Service

I, Pebau.grandauer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pebau.grandauer (talk) 15:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done It looks like there's already an article by this same name in the mainspace, which was also created by you and looks to be in slightly better condition than the AfC version. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Web Coverage Processing Service

Could not find a reason for deleting; earlier, it was stated that the article contains copyrighted material, but without proper hint. I have rechecked and cannot find any. Glad to get a hint and improve where necessary. -Pebau.grandauer (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I can't see where it was tagged as containing copyvio. Was it for another article? In either case, the best thing to do would be to contact the person who tagged it as a copyvio to see what can be done or changed. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Williams Ibekwe

This article is about a teenage entrepreneur who owns a company and has a plans in life. The article is to encourage teenagers to do what they know how to do best and not what they see others do or what they have no idea about. He is following in the footsteps of his role model, Bill Gates. -Willybeez (talk) 22:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. That's nice and nothing personal but that's not the purpose here. The page was properly deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you are interested in reviving the article, please review that and our examples of reliable sources and provide third-party sources that show that the article involves a person who fits under that criteria. And no, your facebook page does not qualify. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Lake Tahoe / Among Angels (Kate Bush single)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bfenby (talk) 23:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:44, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Jumino Suhadi

The article should not be deleted because it gives various kinds of information about an outstanding man named Jumino Suhadi. Many people require the information as his biography will be launched by the end of this year. -Jumino Suhadi Prof. (talk) 05:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. I tried searching in AfC space and by your own edits, but I can't find anything. On a side note, your username suggests that you are either the professor himself or have some other form of WP:COI. Please be aware that writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged. I'd also recommend that you read over WP:PROF to ensure that he passes notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Awad

This page was a name/dab page before it was assumingly vandalised, then erroneously deleted. -John Cengiz talk 01:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WorldTop7

I, Globi2002, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Globi2002 (talk) 19:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done This is just a little too promotional in tone to restore, and I notice that you'd been cautioned about this twice by two different editors. You'd pretty much have to re-write most of the entire article from scratch to remove the promotional tone, so it'd be better to start with a fresh new rendition. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Peter Hamilton

Updates had not been made to the page in 6 months as I had been waiting for more concrete sources to reveal Peter Hamilton's notability. As I believed those became available I tried to edit the page but found that it had been deleted. I would be extremely grateful if it was undeleted so that I could continue to make adjustments as per Wikipedia requirements. Thank you so much! -Watson.alex7 (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

O+ USA

I want to usefy this page before adding more sources involving history and popularity. -Shadowgun master (talk) 05:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Interior Semiotics

This article was deleted with PROD. I think the article is not insignificant, the performance 'Interior Semiotics' was referred to in a discussion about performance art in the Guardian -Balko Kabo (talk) 23:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I was going to send it to your userspace, but I think that it'd be reasonable enough to keep in the mainspace for the time being while you work on it. Let me know if you want it moved to your userspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Doug Given

I wish to improve the article with more reliable sources -Kawika (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Groovedelicious

I, Frieda Beamy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frieda Beamy (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Windows 2000.png

I would like to request that all revisions of this fair-use image be temporarily restored as I have reason to think that the wrong revision was chosen for use at the related article. I would like to have the opportunity to examine the past revisions to see if this is indeed the case. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done I believe I did this correctly, but if I didn't then we'll probably need another one of the admins to step in and fix it. I've never really restored previous histories of images before. 05:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

generifus

I, Sultsult, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sultsult (talk) 06:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mu'mina

I, Muminbeliever, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AmirAlMumineen 02:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done This is because of several reasons. First off, this already has an article at Mu'mina. Secondly, it didn't have any content that wasn't already on the existing page. I'm a little concerned that this page doesn't really have any reliable sources to show that it merits an entry outside of Islam, as this could probably be summed up in a few sentences and merged into the parent article. I won't nominate it or anything, but I can't guarantee that someone else will, so this page will need to be cleaned up and edited to establish notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
    And Mu'mina was substantially identical to Mu'min, so I have redirected it there. At least Mu'min has some references, although I am skeptical that the term merits a stand-alone article. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tactica Interactive

Ready to edit and address previous concerns -Angheck (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kevin M. Slawin

I, SJSCU Rebellion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SJSCU Rebellion (talk) 18:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

KLE Society's S Nijalingappa College

I will change the contents of article -Klesncbangalore (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The page was deleted as being overly promotional. I looked at the page and it would need to be completely re-written in order to be on the mainspace, so your best option at this point would be to re-write it from scratch. I'd probably recommend WP:AfC for the time being, as you'd have a bit more time to write the article and establish notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

I strongly believe Klesncbangalore, he knows more about fixing and creating a wikipedia article than I do. There will be more people looking at this as the 2014 Massachusetts Governor's race goes on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plyjacks (talk • contribs) 19:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carpe Fulgur

I, Jlight88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jlight88 (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. the panda ₯’ 21:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Deep wasnik

Deep Wasnik is a well known person in yavatmal region and thus it is essential to feed is information over Wikipedia as to make it convenient for people searching him over internet -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Choclithug (talk • contribs) 20:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wananchi Group

I, Drdincic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drdincic (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note: this could easily have been deleted as inherently promotional - and it could soon be if not repaired. the panda ₯’ 21:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Imprint Lab

142.129.79.12 (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Fischer_(entrepreneur)

John Fischer is a key player in the Boulder startup and small business community. His knowledge of entrepreneurship and open-book management make him a mentor to many budding business owners, and his sponsorship of local events helps keep the business community networked and engaged. His work with StickerGiant has even visited space on a NASA shuttle, and StickerGiant has produced thousands of stickers, including clients like Google. Stickers are a cultural artifact, and John's company helps contribute to popular culture through their products. -Andrewmatranga (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user GB fan (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Edward W. Chance Reserve

Page was deleted as a creation by a banned user. I am going through the Southwest Florida Water Management Guide and I'd like to see what was there and create an article on this subject. According to the guide the preserve has two tracts encompassing almost 8,000 acres. Happy to work on it in my userspace or article space whichever is more appropriate. Thanks. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Candleabracadabra/Edward W. Chance Reserve. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Half Moon Wildlife Management Area

Same reasoning as above. 9,480 acre preserve. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Candleabracadabra/Half Moon Wildlife Management Area. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_132&oldid=1138663647"