Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Syrian Civil War 2


Syrian Civil War 2

edit
Editors involved in this dispute
  1. Rqasd (talk · contribs) – filing party
  2. FutureTrillionaire (talk · contribs)
  3. Kudzu1 (talk · contribs)
Articles affected by this dispute
  1. Syrian Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  2. Talk:Syrian Civil War#Advanced weaponry and tactics (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated

edit
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
  1. Intervening edits are not encyclopedic, sources are not WP:RS, and tone violates WP:NPOV. (TW))?
  2. today I corrected his change. in addition, my sources are credible sources. this is a documentary video. this is not fiction. many authors use as sources, which are not recognized in the world media who speak well about the opposition. BUT, why can't I apply authoritative media (news release - message media+news release - a documentary film)?? the source is of translation, and a link to the translation of.
  • look. if you are against such a contribution (if you are against this editing). please. detailed answer why. in order not to initiate administrative proceedings. --Rqasd (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC) you have reverted the edit, said - Undoing pov pushing and use of unreliable sources. I changed the edits. now there is no such problem? pov? unreliable sources - it is impossible. all sources is very authoritative media, they work *news*, worldwide, many years. if you do not have a source that ITAR-TASS's a lie (specifically those articles that I used), if you have no source (*battle for Syria* it's a lie). you can't delete my edits. it is outside the rules. in addition, I give the translation. I give references are free from copyright. in addition, the recording of TV ether (news release) this is the authoritative source. this is a verifiable source. moreover, *the battle for Syria* is a documentary film. other sources (if there are sources without translation tell me and I mend). but you can't simply delete all at once. my sources have become in Wikipedia. you can read about them that is large media (news)
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1

but! you don't have source. a source said: ИТАРР-TASS + *battle for Syria* (documentary film) it's a lie. can you just acknowledge their wrong?Rqasd (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

edit
  1. Agree. Rqasd (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Disagree. Mediation is not needed. Try WP:DRN or WP:RSN first.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Disagree. Mediation isn't going to be helpful in this case. -Kudzu1 (talk) 15:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Without agreement of the named parties to this dispute, we cannot proceed with formal mediation. Perhaps this should go to WP:DRN first. Sunray (talk) 19:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

edit