Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
editMediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.
|
Resolved:
Party has become very inactive; assumption of lack of interest.
- This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.
Involved parties
editArticles involved
editOther steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
editIssues to be mediated
edit- Removal of POV from Dictator of Rome section of Lucius Cornelius Sulla article.
- Apology from Sulla16 for insulting me on one occasion and ordering me on one occasion.
Additional issues to be mediated
editNone.
Parties' agreement to mediate
edit- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. Vincent 23:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Sulla16 21:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Statement by Sulla16
editI apologize for any hurt Vincent may be feeling. As to the source of the dispute - Vfp15 is deleting sourced material backing up my point. Please see notes 9 & 10 in the article on Sulla. Thanks for agreeing to mediate... Sulla16 21:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Even though he's apologizing for what I feel instead of, more properly, apologizing for what he did, I'll accept the apology. Vincent 23:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
editComment: The second note asking for an apology is not within our realm, as we cannot force civility, although we heavily encourage it.
- For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 00:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Accepted
- For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 01:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
On hold: Pending outcome of RFAR.
- For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 01:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Closed: One party has apparently stopped editing accurately and so the case is being closed. —Sean Whitton / 10:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.