Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Jewish lobby

Jewish lobby edit

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Partially successful, Parties no longer participating.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 02:36, January 23 2008 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Articles involved edit

Jewish lobby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted edit

Lengthy Talk: discussion starting here
Arbitration enforcement here

Issues to be mediated edit

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

Should the article be restricted to secondary sources that discuss the term "Jewish lobby" or should it also include primary sources that simply use the term.

Additional issues to be mediated edit

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there are more than two parties involved in this case.

Is "Jewish lobby" a neologism within the meaning of WP:NEO? --John Nagle (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:POV excuses and double standards regarding what statements “about” the phrase can be used and what quotes can be used to illustrate statements “about” the phrase, thereby excluding common uses and viewpoints and making it impossible to have an article that truly is WP:NPOV.Carol Moore 21:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc {talk}
If primary sources were to be excluded because of WP:NOR and WP:NEO, would a summary of these primary sources with citations to support their use be acceptable instead (e.g. see here). Jgui (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can a claim of WP:NOR be used to block insertion of a quote from a RS even when the quote discusses the phrase (see here). Jgui (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.

Agree. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Jgui (talk) 02:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Lobojo (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Nagle (talk · contribs) --John Nagle (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Carolmooredc {talk}
Agree. <<-armon->> (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. CasualObserver'48 (talk) 07:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.

Accept,

For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 01:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.