Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ebionites 2

Request for formal mediation
Request for formal mediation
Article	Ebionites (talk)
Submitted	16 Sep 2010
Mediator	Not yet assigned
Status	Awaiting party agreement
Notes	None
	view; talk; edit; delete; watch;

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

For an explanation of why the case was closed, refer to the talk page or contact the Mediation Committee

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Ebionites edit

Dispute specifics edit

Involved users

Articles concerned in this dispute

Ebionites (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

Talk:Ebionites/Mediation

Issues to be mediated edit

Primary issues

Issue 1 - Article structure
Issue 2 - Amount of weight to be given patristic sources for the subject
Issue 3 - Amount of weight to be given interpretations of patristic sources
Issue 4 - Matters of WP:FRINGE
Issue 5 - Use/misuse of primary and tertiary sources
Issue 6 - Proper application of WP:V and WP:R
Issue 7 - Weight to be given interpretations of non-patristic sources
Issue 8 - Maintaining WP:NPOV

Additional issues (added by other parties)

Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation edit

All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the talk page of this request.

Agree. John Carter (talk) 17:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Ovadyah (talk) 15:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. --Michael C. Price ^talk 19:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree that mediation is needed, but I will unable to be very active, if at all.Nishidani (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.

Note: Parties notified. AGK 23:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Accept. For the Committee, AGK 11:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Accept case. --WGFinley (talk) 00:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.