Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Duchy of Pless

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Original issue resolved, Mediation unecessary.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Duchy of Pless edit

view edit delete watch
Filed: 19:13, January 14 2008 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Pmanderson (talk · contribs)
Poeticbent (talk · contribs)

Articles involved edit

Duchy of Pless (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted edit

Discussion on Talk:Duchy of Pless#Blanking and elsewhere on that page.
Request for intervention by Piotrus (talk · contribs) as a third party.
Messages to PoeticBent, here and here.

Issues to be mediated edit

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

Issues of copyright and inclusion of a specific paragraph (link; issue refactored, previously-included extended comments viewable in the history)

Additional issues to be mediated edit

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there is more than two parties involved in this case.

Neutral point of view, specifically undue weight (issue refactored, previously-included extended comments viewable in the history)

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.

Agree. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Poeticbent talk 19:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.

Accept,

For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 01:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.