Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Held nominations/Archive1
This page is an archive of past nominations on Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Held nominations. Please do not edit the archived discussions on this page. Place {{subst:Rvha}} above the header of a discussion and {{subst:Rvhb}} under the last line of a discussion when placing it on this page. Archived nominationseditThe following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 1/1/3
It is a B-class article of medium importance. Funpika 00:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 3/0/0 I don't see why we need it, and it doesn't seem very important. Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 00:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 0/4/0
M. C. Escher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) I haven't heard of him before, and his article does not say that he is very important. The article isn't very good either. Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 17:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 1/0/3 Stub. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
This isn't a stub now - it's currently a Start, but still pretty sparse. Walkerma 02:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 3/0/0
This article was discussed here and ultimately decided to hold it because of its mid level importance even though it passes WP:CHEMS's asssment criteria for A level quality. JoeSmack Talk 19:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Support = Hold (or I am grossly wrong and want to change my vote) Andrewjd 22:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 0/0/3 POV/OR-maybe. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Sacred Heart Convent School (Jamshedpur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)editNumber of votes: 3/0/0 Not important enough for release Andrewjd 17:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 3/0/0 Original nomination: That such a topic could be intelligently analyzed and discussed so extensively is an impressive feat. I think this article is exceptional. --Raoul Duke 18:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 3/0/0 Stub.
Include
I reviewed this for V0.7 as part of WP:CORESUP, unaware of Lincher's review, and I came to the same conclusion. Walkerma 04:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 0/4/0 Original nomination: FA-class, important Heavy Metal group, extremely influential in the Thrash Metal genre. LuciferMorgan 08:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
Number of votes: 0/0/3 B, needs wikification. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a Wikipedia 0.7 Held nomination. Please do not modify it.
|