Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 May 31

Mathematics desk
< May 30 << Apr | May | Jun >> June 1 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


May 31

edit

Meridional Radius of Curvature

edit

Hi y'all.

 
(φ, β = geodetic, reduced latitudes)


If   equals the "meridional radius of curvature", then what does

  equal ("reduced meridional radius of curvature"?) and what is its symbol (rM(β)? )?

--2601:19C:4A01:7057:4C27:AD22:B7E2:D04A (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot relate the quantity   to a radius of curvature. It is the speed of a particle moving along the meridian for  
For the radius of curvature of the meridian at reduced latitude   I find
 
As far as I know there is no standardized symbol for this. I don't think that the notation   is common either.  --Lambiam 20:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course   and   are valid (though here written with e and e' instead of a and b), but β is not given its own integral identity, even though  . 2601:19C:4A01:3561:4C27:AD22:B7E2:D04A (talk) 03:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what it means that   is "valid".
The angles   and   are related by
 
Here is a numeric example, randomly generated:
  = 239.2188308713,   = 192.1989786957
  = 1.3880315979,   = 1.4233752785
Then
  = 292.5274922901
 
   = 292.5274922901
This is not a numerical coincidence. For comparison,
  = 237.8141595361.
 --Lambiam 09:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Right,   but  !
So what is  , which equals  ?--2601:19C:4A01:650:1123:BA2C:D056:629 (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Writing   for the meridional radius of curvature, a variable that depends on   (or, equivalently, on  ), we have:
 
This is the tangential speed of a particle moving along the meridian when   in which case the rhs equals    --Lambiam 17:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so you are saying   is the variable for tangential speed (let's call it "S") and using the chain rule:  M(φ) = S(β(φ))β'(φ) and S(β) = M(φ(β))φ'(β), therefore M(φ)dφ = S(β)dβ.
But:    and   , while   and  , so S is a radius, not speed (I know, speed here is a calculus thing, not literally "speed", but still) and I should point out S(90-β) = R(β), geocentric radius! --2601:19C:4A01:650:19F3:4CE1:97CE:10D5 (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also just figured out  , the prime vertical radius of curvature and conversely, of course,  .  --2601:19C:4A01:6E9F:1937:5ABC:70DF:B9B3 (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My $0.02:   plays a favored role in defining the radius of curvature because this latitude defines the normal vector to the meridian and so is directly related to the definition of curvature. The corresponding expression in terms of   is useful in carrying out integrals but I don't think it's necessary to invent a name for the integrand. cffk (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, isn't "S" the integrand for geodetic distance (just here focused on the north-south meridian distance, either geodetically or as the parametric version of the plane Pythagorean distance), with respect to σ rather than β? I've seen some articles define the geodetic "s" as the spacetime variable, itself!  --2601:19C:4A01:C40C:A8A9:9580:7416:38DE (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While the terms meridian, latitude and geodesic suggest a problem in spheroidal geometry, everything going on here can mathematically be seen as taking place on a good old planar ellipse. The formula
 
gives the elliptic arc length between two points on an ellipse in the standard parametric representation   using   as the name of the parameter. It is easily seen to be equivalent to the formula given at Ellipse § Arc length.  --Lambiam 04:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]